A perceptual similarity space for speech based on self-supervised speech representations
Open Access
- 1 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 155 (6) , 3915-3929
Abstract
Speech recognition by both humans and machines frequently fails in non-optimal yet common situations. For example, word recognition error rates for second-language (L2) speech can be high, especially under conditions involving background noise. At the same time, both human and machine speech recognition sometimes shows remarkable robustness against signal- and noise-related degradation. Which acoustic features of speech explain this substantial variation in intelligibility? Current approaches align speech to text to extract a small set of pre-defined spectro-temporal properties from specific sounds in particular words. However, variation in these properties leaves much cross-talker variation in intelligibility unexplained. We examine an alternative approach utilizing a perceptual similarity space acquired using self-supervised learning. This approach encodes distinctions between speech samples without requiring pre-defined acoustic features or speech-to-text alignment. We show that L2 English speech samples are less tightly clustered in the space than L1 samples reflecting variability in English proficiency among L2 talkers. Critically, distances in this similarity space are perceptually meaningful: L1 English listeners have lower recognition accuracy for L2 speakers whose speech is more distant in the space from L1 speech. These results indicate that perceptual similarity may form the basis for an entirely new speech and language analysis approach.Keywords
Funding Information
- United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (2022618)
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DHR2219843)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neural representations for modeling variation in speechJournal of Phonetics, 2022
- Revisiting Popular Speech Recognition Software for ESL SpeechTESOL Quarterly, 2020
- Perception of Speech Produced by Native and Nonnative Talkers by Listeners with Normal Hearing and Listeners with Cochlear ImplantsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2014
- Auditory free classification of nonnative speechJournal of Phonetics, 2013
- Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and durationSpeech Communication, 2013
- A perceptual phonetic similarity space for languages: Evidence from five native language listener groupsSpeech Communication, 2010
- Which words are hard to recognize? Prosodic, lexical, and disfluency factors that increase speech recognition error ratesSpeech Communication, 2010
- Vowel Space Characteristics and Vowel Identification AccuracyJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2008
- Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Acoustic Characteristics of VowelsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2007
- Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristicsSpeech Communication, 1996