Measuring What Matters: RECIST Response Does Not Predict HRQoL in Early-Phase Clinical Trials
Authors:
- Jessie NguyenJNJessie Nguyen
- Udit NindraUNUdit Nindra
- Joanne TangJTJoanne Tang
- Walid ZwiekyWZWalid Zwieky
- Jun Hee HongJHJun Hee Hong
- Martin HongMHMartin Hong
- Joseph DescallarJDJoseph Descallar
- Andrew KillenAKAndrew Killen
- Adam CooperACAdam Cooper
- Kate WilkinsonKWKate Wilkinson
- Abhijit PalAPAbhijit Pal
- Christina TengCTChristina Teng
Open Access
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Early-phase clinical trials (EPCTs) focus on safety and preliminary efficacy, often assessed by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) tumour response. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is rarely evaluated in EPCTs and may not align with radiological outcomes. Methods: The PEARLER (Patient Experience in Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials) study evaluated the demographics, tumour response, HRQoL, and therapy type in two early-phase trial units in Australia between August 2023 and 2024. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and follow-ups. The Global Health Status (GHS) score was selected as the primary HRQoL measure. Tumour response was assessed using RECIST 1.1. Spearman correlation and Kruskal–Wallis testing assessed the associations between RECIST, cross-sectional GHS change (ΔGHS; follow-up minus baseline), and therapy types. Multilevel models were used to evaluate longitudinal GHS values per RECIST category. Results: Of 122 patients recruited to the PEARLER study, 74 patients had paired RECIST and HRQoL data (complete response (CR) n = 0; partial response (PR) n = 15; stable disease (SD) n = 39; progressive disease (PD) n = 20). The median change in GHS was zero across RECIST groups, with broad individual variability. Notably, 18 of 54 patients (33.3%) with stable or responding disease experienced HRQoL decline. Meanwhile, 10 of 20 (50%) patients with PD experienced stable or improving HRQoL. The best RECIST response and ΔGHS showed a weak but statistically significant negative relationship (Spearman ρ = −0.28, p = 0.017), with the Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrating χ2 = 6.20 (p = 0.045), indicating modest group differences driven by the deterioration in PD patients. The multilevel model demonstrated a lower GHS in patients with PD, with no statistically significant interaction of GHS change over time with the RECIST response (p = 0.226). Conclusions: HRQoL change is largely independent of radiologic tumour response and therapy type in EPCT participants. Patients experienced a HRQoL decline despite tumour response. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes alongside RECIST and safety outcomes is important to fully capture the impact of investigational therapies and guide patient-centred trial designs.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 2.0 (ESMO-MCBS v2.0)Annals of Oncology, 2025
- Financial toxicity in early‐phase cancer clinical trial participantsCancer, 2024
- International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trialsQuality of Life Research, 2023
- Patient‐reported outcome measures for emotional functioning in cancer patients: Content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, FACT‐G, HADS, SF‐36, PRO‐CTCAE, and PROMIS instrumentsPsycho-Oncology, 2023
- Effect of Electronic Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic CancerJAMA, 2022
- The role of patient-reported outcome measures in the continuum of cancer clinical care: ESMO Clinical Practice GuidelineAnnals of Oncology, 2022
- Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial ProtocolsJAMA, 2018
- The longitudinal relationship between quality of life and survival in advanced stage cancerPsycho-Oncology, 2015
- New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)European Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Phase I participants’ views of quality of life and trial participation burdensSupportive Care in Cancer, 2007