Aetiology of vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, and genital ulcer in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-regression
Authors:
- Julia MichalowJMJulia Michalow
- Magdalene K WaltersMWMagdalene K Walters
- Olanrewaju EdunOEOlanrewaju Edun
- Max WybrantMWMax Wybrant
- Bethan DaviesBDBethan Davies
- Tendesayi KufaTKTendesayi Kufa
- Sungai T ChabataSCSungai T Chabata
- Frances M CowanFCFrances M Cowan
- Anne CoriACAnne Cori
- Marie-Claude BoilyMBMarie-Claude Boily
- Jeffrey W Imai-EatonJIJeffrey W Imai-Eaton
Preprint
Abstract
Introduction: Syndromic management is widely used to treat symptomatic sexually transmitted infections in settings lacking aetiologic diagnostics. However, heterogeneity in underlying aetiologies and consequent treatment suitability are uncertain without regular assessment. This systematic review characterised aetiologies for vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, and genital ulcer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, and Web of Science until July 25, 2022, and grey literature until August 31, 2022, for studies reporting aetiologic diagnoses among symptomatic populations in SSA. We adjusted observations for diagnostic test performance and used generalised linear mixed-effects meta-regressions to estimate aetiologic distributions, trends, and determinants. Results: Of 4136 identified records, 198 reports were included from 183 studies in 32 countries between 1969 and 2022. In 2015, primary aetiologies for vaginal discharge were candidiasis (69.4% [95% CI:44.1-86.6%], n=50), bacterial vaginosis (50.0% [32.3-67.8%], n=39), chlamydia (16.5% [8.7-29.0%], n=49), and trichomoniasis (12.9% [7.7-20.7%], n=78); for urethral discharge were gonorrhoea (78.8% [70.9-85.1%], n=67) and chlamydia (22.2% [16.0-30.1%], n=48); and for genital ulcer were HSV-2 (56.1% [39.2-71.6%], n=46) and syphilis (7.8% [5.3-11.4%], n=115). Regional variation was marginal. Temporal variation was substantial, particularly for genital ulcer. For each symptom, HIV-status and age were significantly associated with infection diagnoses, although aetiologic hierarchies were largely the same by strata. Conclusion: Syndrome aetiologies in SSA align with WHO guidelines without strong evidence of contextual or demographic variation, supporting broad guideline applicability. Temporal changes underscore the need for aetiologic re-assessment. STI surveillance using syndrome-based assessments is noncomprehensive and requires studies among symptomatic and asymptomatic populations.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: PLOS Medicine, 21 (5), e1004385.
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: A Current Understanding and Burning QuestionsJournal of Fungi, 2020
- Diagnosing sexually transmitted infections in resource‐constrained settings: challenges and ways forwardJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2019
- Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2019
- Chapter 5: Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence2019
- Trends and Predictors of Syphilis Prevalence in the General Population: Global Pooled Analyses of 1103 Prevalence Measures Including 136 Million Syphilis TestsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2017
- Epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of Haemophilus ducreyi – a disappearing pathogen?Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 2014
- Misclassification errors in prevalence estimation: Bayesian handling with careInternational Journal of Public Health, 2012
- The effect of syndromic management interventions on the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in South AfricaSexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2011
- Sexually Transmitted ProctitidesClinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 2007
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases1998