It’s time for a minimum synoptic operation template in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review
Open Access
- 17 March 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in World Journal of Emergency Surgery
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
Background: Despite the call to enhance accuracy and value of operation records few international recommended minimal standards for operative notes documentation have been described. This study undertook a systematic review of existing operative reporting systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to fashion a comprehensive, synoptic operative reporting template for the future. Methods: A search for all relevant articles was conducted using PubMed version of Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases in June 2021, for publications from January 1st 2011 to October 25th 2021, using the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND operation notes OR operative notes OR proforma OR documentation OR report OR narrative OR audio-visual OR synoptic OR digital. Two reviewers (NOC, GMC) independently assessed each published study using a MINORS score of ≥ 16 for comparative and ≥ 10 for non-comparative for inclusion. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Synoptic operative templates from published data were assimilated into one “ideal” laparoscopic operative report template following international input from the World Society of Emergency Surgery board. Results: A total of 3567 articles were reviewed. Following MINORS grading 25 studies were selected spanning 14 countries and 4 continents. Twenty-two studies were prospective. A holistic overview of the operative procedure documentation was reported in 6/25 studies and a further 19 papers dealt with selective surgical aspects of LC. A unique synoptic LC operative reporting template was developed and translated into Chinese/Mandarin, French and Arabic. Conclusion: This systematic review identified a paucity of publications dealing with operative reporting of LC. The proposed new template may be integrated digitally with hospitals’ medical systems and include additional narrative text and audio-visual data. The template may help define new OR (operating room) recording standards and impact on care for patients undergoing LC.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Simple Effective Method for Generation of a Permanent Record of the Critical View of Safety during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Intraoperative “Doublet” PhotographyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2014
- ATOM, the all-inclusive, nominal EAES classification of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2013
- Differences Between Attendings’ and Residents’ Operative Notes for Laparoscopic CholecystectomyWorld Journal of Surgery, 2013
- Comparison of operative notes with real-time observation of adhesiolysis-related complications during surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2013
- Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Operative ReportsArchives of Surgery, 2010
- A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global PopulationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Comparison of data extraction from standardized versus traditional narrative operative reports for database-related research and quality controlSurgery, 2007
- Operative Note Dictation: Should It Be Taught Routinely in Residency Programs?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004