Data quality of a wearable vital signs monitor in the pre-hospital and emergency departments for enhancing prediction of needs for life-saving interventions in trauma patients
- 19 June 2015
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
- Vol. 39 (6) , 316-321
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the quality of data in the pre-hospital and emergency departments when using a wearable vital signs monitor and examine the efficacy of a combined model of standard vital signs and respective data quality indices (DQIs) for predicting the need for life-saving interventions (LSIs) in trauma patients. It was hypothesised that prediction of needs for LSIs in trauma patients is associated with data quality. Also, a model utilizing vital signs and DQIs to predict the needs for LSIs would be able to outperform models using vital signs alone. Data from 104 pre-hospital trauma patients transported by helicopter were analysed, including means and standard deviations of continuous vital signs, related DQIs and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores for LSI and non-LSI patient groups. DQIs involved percentages of valid measurements and mean deviation ratios. Various multivariate logistic regression models for predicting LSI needs were also obtained and compared through receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Demographics of patients were not statistically different between LSI and non-LSI patient groups. In addition, ROC curves demonstrated better prediction of LSI needs in patients using heart rate and DQIs (area under the curve [AUC] of 0.86) than using heart rate alone (AUC of 0.73). Likewise, ROC curves demonstrated better prediction using heart rate, total GCS score and DQIs (AUC of 0.99) than using heart rate and total GCS score (AUC of 0.92). AUCs were statistically different (p < 0.05). This study showed that data quality could be used in addition to continuous vital signs for predicting the need for LSIs in trauma patients. Importantly, trauma systems should incorporate processes to regulate data quality of physiologic data in the pre-hospital and emergency departments. By doing so, data quality could be improved and lead to better prediction of needs for LSIs in trauma patients.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statin Treatment in Hypercholesterolemic Men Does Not Attenuate Angiotensin II-Induced VenoconstrictionPLOS ONE, 2014
- Evaluation of standard versus nonstandard vital signs monitors in the prehospital and emergency departmentsJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2014
- Utility of Vital Signs, Heart Rate Variability and Complexity, and Machine Learning for Identifying the Need for Lifesaving Interventions in Trauma PatientsShock, 2014
- Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm and hybrid system to predict the need for life-saving interventions in trauma patientsMedical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2013
- Detecting Vital Signs with Wearable Wireless SensorsSensors, 2010
- Predicting the Need to Perform Life-Saving Interventions in Trauma Patients by Using New Vital Signs and Artificial Neural Networks2009
- Exploration of Prehospital Vital Sign Trends for the Prediction of Trauma OutcomesPrehospital Emergency Care, 2009
- Robust heart rate estimation from multiple asynchronous noisy sources using signal quality indices and a Kalman filterPhysiological Measurement, 2007
- Integrated monitoring and analysis for early warning of patient deteriorationBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2006
- The challenge of complexity in health careBMJ, 2001