Anode heel effect: Does it impact image quality in digital radiography? A systematic literature review
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Radiography
- Vol. 27 (3) , 976-981
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- VGC ANALYZER: A SOFTWARE FOR STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FULLY CROSSED MULTIPLE-READER MULTIPLE-CASE VISUAL GRADING CHARACTERISTICS STUDIESRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 2016
- A systematic procedure to optimise dose and image quality for the measurement of inter-vertebral angles from lateral spinal projections using Cobb and superimposition methodsJournal of X-Ray Science and Technology, 2014
- An Investigation on the Non-uniform Distribution of Radiation Intensity Output of Diagnostic X-ray TubesJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 2014
- Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging systemBritish Journal of Radiology, 2013
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy StudiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2011
- Digital radiography detectors – A technical overview: Part 2Radiography, 2009
- An Automatic Correction Method for the Heel Effect in Digitized Mammography ImagesJournal of Digital Imaging, 2007
- Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluationBritish Journal of Radiology, 2007
- "Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography.British Journal of Radiology, 2000
- Half‐value layer and intensity variations as a function of position in the radiation field for film‐screen mammographyMedical Physics, 1999