The Argument-Based Approach to Validity Applied to Clinical Outcome Assessments: Some History and Notable Features
- 11 April 2025
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 28 (7) , 997-1000
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Recall Periods for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Quantitative MethodsValue in Health, 2024
- Developing, Selecting, and Modifying Performance Outcome AssessmentsValue in Health, 2023
- An Interview With the Food and Drug Administration About Draft Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidance 3: Selecting, Developing, or Modifying Fit-for-Purpose Clinical Outcome AssessmentsValue in Health, 2023
- Using validity theory and psychometrics to evaluate and support expanded uses of existing scalesQuality of Life Research, 2022
- Constructing arguments for the interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures in research: an application of modern validity theoryQuality of Life Research, 2021
- Generalizing from qualitative data as a moral activity: An example from regulatory decision making for medical products.Qualitative Psychology, 2021
- Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validityQuality of Life Research, 2018
- Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series–Paper 7: modern perspectives of measurement validation emphasize justification of inferences based on patient reported outcome scoresJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017
- Fit for purpose and modern validity theory in clinical outcomes assessmentQuality of Life Research, 2017
- An argument-based approach to validity.Psychological Bulletin, 1992