Comparison of simulation-based and online-based anaphylaxis training for improving the emergency competencies of elementary school nurses: a quasi-experimental study
Author:
Open Access
- 26 May 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Nursing
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
The potential for life-threatening allergic reactions in elementary schoolchildren has emerged as a major problem. There are, however, concerns about whether school nurses have the necessary competencies to respond to such emergency situations. This study developed simulation-based anaphylaxis training (SBAT) and online-based anaphylaxis training (OBAT) programs and compared their efficacy for improving elementary school nurses’ competencies in emergencies involving life-threatening anaphylactic events. This is a quasi-experimental study. The sample comprised 40 and 47 elementary school nurses placed in the SBAT and OBAT groups, respectively. The effects of the intervention were analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) The pre-post differences were significantly higher in the SBAT group compared to the OBAT group in terms of knowledge (1.97 ± 1.21 vs. 0.87 ± 1.37; p < 0.001), self-efficacy (7.50 ± 6.37 vs. 3.42 ± 4.47, p = 0.005), perceived performance competency in emergency care (4.11 ± 3.73 vs. − 0.76 ± 3.40; p < 0.001), and critical thinking (7.02 ± 10.36 vs. 2.40 ± 8.03, p = 0.031). A within-group comparison of the SBAT group showed that all outcome measures significantly improved (p < 0.001). However, in the OBAT group, only knowledge (p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (p < 0.001) significantly improved from the pretest. Compared with OBAT, the SBAT program was more suitable for enhancing the perceived performance competency and critical thinking of elementary school nurses in emergency anaphylactic care. Therefore, school nursing trainers are advised to incorporate SBAT into continuing education programs for school nurses.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (018R1C1B5086483)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- ‘The Diamond’: a structure for simulation debriefThe Clinical Teacher, 2015
- Effects of high‐fidelity patient simulation led clinical reasoning course: Focused on nursing core competencies, problem solving, and academic self‐efficacyJapan Journal of Nursing Science, 2015
- Comparison of knowledge, confidence in skill performance (CSP) and satisfaction in problem-based learning (PBL) and simulation with PBL educational modalities in caring for children with bronchiolitisNurse Education Today, 2015
- International survey of knowledge of food‐induced anaphylaxisPediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2014
- Long-term Effectiveness of Online Anaphylaxis Education for PharmacistsAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 2014
- Clinical decision-making augmented by simulation training: neural correlates demonstrated by functional imaging: a pilot studyBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2014
- Using Principles of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses in School Nurse Continuing EducationThe Journal of School Nursing, 2013
- Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the EvidenceAcademic Medicine, 2011
- The role of simulation for learning within pre-registration nursing education — A literature reviewNurse Education Today, 2010
- The transitional journey through the graduate year: A focus group studyInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2007