How Does Oncoplastic Surgery Compare with Standard Partial Mastectomy? A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes
- 22 August 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 150 (5) , 950e-958e
Abstract
Background: Many breast-conserving surgical options exist for patients with breast cancer. Surgical choices can have lasting effects on a patient’s life, so patient satisfaction is important to assess. Patient-reported outcome measures provide important tools when evaluating surgical modalities. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how patients describe breast-conserving surgical choices in standard partial mastectomy and oncoplastic surgery options. Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was performed in PubMed for studies discussing standard partial mastectomy or oncoplastic surgery and measurement of preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q or other validated patient-reported outcome measures. Oncoplastic surgery was categorized as volume displacement or volume replacement. Articles in languages other than English, not involving partial mastectomy or oncoplastic surgery, or not measuring patient-reported outcomes were excluded. Weighted proportions were generated and analyzed with a Welch t test. Results: Of 390 articles, 43 met inclusion criteria, and 8784 patients were included in a pooled database. Although standard partial mastectomy scored well, oncoplastic surgery performed significantly better than partial mastectomy in all postoperative BREAST-Q categories: satisfaction with breasts (74.3 versus 65.7), psychosocial well-being (81.3 versus 78.0), sexual well-being (61.6 versus 54.9), and satisfaction with outcome (85.4 versus 62.2). Level 2 volume displacement surgery had the most favorable scores. Conclusions: Breast-conserving surgical choices that include a variety of oncoplastic surgery and partial mastectomy methods all score well in patient-reported outcome measures, with oncoplastic surgery significantly preferred over partial mastectomy. Oncoplastic surgery should be considered in all cases, and the appropriate breast-conserving surgical choice should depend on the patient’s tumor presentation and anatomy.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision RatesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2015
- Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery: The new paradigmJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2014
- A Meta-Analysis Comparing Breast Conservation Therapy Alone to the Oncoplastic TechniqueAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2014
- An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing Breast QThe Breast, 2013
- Oncoplastic principles in breast conserving surgeryThe Breast, 2011
- Measuring Quality of Life in Oncologic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome MeasuresThe Breast Journal, 2010
- Measuring Quality of Life in Cosmetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes InstrumentsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007
- Oncoplastic approaches to partial mastectomy: an overview of volume-displacement techniquesThe Lancet Oncology, 2005
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Twenty-Five-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Radical Mastectomy, Total Mastectomy, and Total Mastectomy Followed by IrradiationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002