Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
The network scale-up method enables researchers to estimate the size of hidden populations, such as drug injectors and sex workers, using sampled social network data. The basic scale-up estimator offers advantages over other size estimation techniques, but it depends on problematic modeling assumptions. We propose a new generalized scale-up estimator that can be used in settings with non-random social mixing and imperfect awareness about membership in the hidden population. Further, the new estimator can be used when data are collected via complex sample designs and from incomplete sampling frames. However, the generalized scale-up estimator also requires data from two samples: one from the frame population and one from the hidden population. In some situations these data from the hidden population can be collected by adding a small number of questions to already planned studies. For other situations, we develop interpretable adjustment factors that can be applied to the basic scale-up estimator. We conclude with practical recommendations for the design and analysis of future studies.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: “STROBE-RDS” statementJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015
- The Importance of Measuring and Accounting for Potential Biases in Respondent-Driven SamplesAIDS and Behavior, 2013
- The game of contacts: Estimating the social visibility of groupsSocial Networks, 2011
- Respondent‐driven sampling as Markov chain Monte CarloStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- “They got their program, and I got mine”: A cautionary tale concerning the ethical implications of using respondent-driven sampling to study injection drug usersInternational Journal of Drug Policy, 2008
- Use of the scale-up methods in injury prevention research: An empirical assessment to the case of choking in childrenSocial Networks, 2007
- Variance Estimation, Design Effects, and Sample Size Calculations for Respondent-Driven SamplingJournal of Urban Health, 2006
- Critical Issues and Further Questions About Respondent-Driven Sampling: Comment on Ramirez-Valles, et al. (2005)AIDS and Behavior, 2005
- Who knows your HIV status? What HIV + patients and their network members know about each otherSocial Networks, 1995
- Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation: Some empirical resultsSocial Science Research, 1991