Estimating the Size of Hidden Populations Using the Generalized Network Scale-Up Estimator
Authors:
Preprint
Abstract
The network scale-up method enables researchers to estimate the size of hidden populations, such as drug injectors and sex workers, using sampled social network data. It offers advantages over other size estimation techniques, but the basic scale-up estimator depends on problematic modeling assumptions. We propose a new generalized scale-up estimator that does not suffer from these problems. The new estimator can be used in realistic settings, like populations with non-random social mixing and imperfect social awareness, and it can accommodate data collection with complex sample designs and incomplete sampling frames. However, the generalized scale-up estimator also requires data from two samples: one from the frame population and one from the hidden population. In some situations these data from the hidden population can be collected by adding a small number of questions to already-planned studies. For other situations, we develop interpretable adjustment factors that can be applied to the basic scale-up estimator. We conclude with practical recommendations for the design and analysis of future studies.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing Network Scale-up Estimates for Groups Most at Risk of HIV/AIDS: Evidence From a Multiple-Method Study of Heavy Drug Users in Curitiba, BrazilAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- The game of contacts: Estimating the social visibility of groupsSocial Networks, 2011
- Counting hard-to-count populations: the network scale-up method for public healthSexually Transmitted Infections, 2010
- Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2010
- Respondent‐driven sampling as Markov chain Monte CarloStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Use of the scale-up methods in injury prevention research: An empirical assessment to the case of choking in childrenSocial Networks, 2007
- Variance Estimation, Design Effects, and Sample Size Calculations for Respondent-Driven SamplingJournal of Urban Health, 2006
- Two interpretations of reports of knowledge of subpopulation sizesSocial Networks, 2003
- A social network approach to estimating seroprevalence in the United StatesSocial Networks, 1998
- Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation: Some empirical resultsSocial Science Research, 1991