Interdependence in negotiation: effects of exit options and social motive on distributive and integrative negotiation
Authors:
- Ellen GiebelsEGEllen Giebels
- Carsten K.W. De DreuCDCarsten K.W. De Dreu
- Evert Van De VliertEVEvert Van De Vliert
- 9 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 30 (2) , 255-272
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Share and Share Alike or Winner Take All?: The Influence of Social Value Orientation upon Choice and Recall of Negotiation HeuristicsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998
- Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998
- Gain–loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: A transformational analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997
- Good News about Competitive People1997
- Coercive Power And Concession Making in Bilateral NegotiationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1995
- The Impact of Social Value Orientations on Negotiator Cognition and BehaviorPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995
- Time Pressure and the Development of Integrative Agreements in Bilateral NegotiationsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1986
- The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Accountability to constituents: A two-edged swordOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984