Telephone vs. mail survey gives different SF-36 quality-of-life scores among cancer survivors
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 61 (10) , 1049-1055
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rationale, design, and implementation of the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivorsCancer, 2006
- Quality of Life Among Long-Term Adolescent and Adult Survivors of Childhood CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- The American Cancer Society’s Studies of Cancer SurvivorsAJN, American Journal of Nursing, 2006
- Quality of life scores differed according to mode of administration in a review of three major oncology questionnairesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Quality of life of 5–10 year breast cancer survivors diagnosed between age 40 and 49Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2004
- Health‐related quality of life of cancer and noncancer patients in Medicare managed careCancer, 2003
- SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study designJournal of Public Health, 1999
- Mode Effects in a Survey of Medicare Prostate Surgery PatientsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1998
- Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthmaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993