Anodal Right Ventricular Capture During Left Ventricular Stimulation in CRT‐Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 28 (7) , 613-619
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve symptoms of patients with moderate to severe heart failure. Optimal CRT involves biventricular or left ventricular (LV) stimulation alone, atrio‐ventricular (AV) delay optimization, and possibly interventricular timing adjustment. Recently, anodal capture of the right ventricle (RV) has been described for patients with CRT‐pacemakers. It is unknown whether the same phenomenon exists in CRT systems associated with defibrillators (CRT‐ICD). The RV leads used in these systems are different from pacemaker leads: they have a larger diameter and shocking coils, which may affect the occurrence of anodal capture. Methods: We looked for anodal RV capture during LV stimulation in 11 consecutive patients who received a CRT‐ICD system with RV leads with a true bipolar design. Fifteen patients who had RV leads with an integrated design were used as controls. Anodal RV and LV thresholds were determined at pulse width (pw) durations of 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 ms. Results: RV anodal capture during LV pacing was found in 11/11 patients at some output with true bipolar RV leads versus 0/15 patients with RV leads with an integrated bipolar design. Anodal RV capture threshold was more affected by changes in pw duration than LV capture threshold. In CRT‐ICD systems, RV leads with a true bipolar design with the proximal ring also used as the anode for LV pacing are associated with a high incidence of anodal RV capture during LV pacing. This may affect the clinical response to alternative resynchronization methods using single LV stimulation or interventricular delay programming.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Performance of Left Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing in Chronic Heart Failure Assessed by Stress EchocardiographyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2004
- Midterm Benefits of Left Univentricular Pacing in Patients With Congestive Heart FailureCirculation, 2004
- Single Site Left Ventricular Pacing for Cardiac ResynchronizationCirculation, 2004
- Cardiac resynchronisation may reduce all-cause mortality: meta-analysis of preliminary COMPANION data with CONTAK-CD, InSync ICD, MIRACLE and MUSTICInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Triple-Site Pacing in Patients with Biventricular Device—Incidence of the Phenomenon and Cardiac Resynchronization BenefitJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2004
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current State of the ArtCirculation, 2004
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy: helpful now in selected patients with CHF.Circulation, 2004
- Ventricular ResynchronizationCirculation, 2004
- Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002