Navigator-gated free-breathing joint T 1 -T 2 mapping of the kidney
Authors:
- Pauline CalarnouPCPauline Calarnou
- Augustin C. OgierAOAugustin C. Ogier
- Christopher W. RoyCRChristopher W. Roy
- Jean-Baptiste LedouxJLJean-Baptiste Ledoux
- Angela RoccaARAngela Rocca
- Menno PruijmMenno Pruijm
- Roger HullinRHRoger Hullin
- Jean- Paul- ValléeJVJean- Paul- Vallée
- Jérôme YerlyJYJérôme Yerly
- Ruud B. van HeeswijkRHRuud B. van Heeswijk
Preprint
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a free-breathing 2D radial joint T₁-T₂ mapping technique for the kidneys at 3T, and to assess the impact of navigator gating parameters on mapping precision and accuracy. Methods: The PARMANav sequence (PArametric Radial MApping with Navigator gating) was implemented for renal imaging, using 25 single-shot radial gradient echo acquisitions with five repeated magnetization preparations and lung-liver navigator gating to avoid through-plane motion. Virtual compressed coil and compressed sensing with spatial and contrast regularization was used for image reconstruction, followed by a model-based registration. An acquisition-specific joint T₁-T₂ dictionary was generated using extended phase graph simulations. T 1 and T 2 accuracies were quantified in a phantom study versus gold standard spin-echo-based sequences. The influence of the navigator acceptance window width (NAWW) and navigator rejection on T 1 and T 2 precision were established in 10 healthy volunteers and were compared to routine T 1 and T 2 mapping. Three patients were scanned to demonstrate clinical feasibility. Results: In the phantom, PARMANav T 1 and T 2 values showed high accuracy with the gold standard T 1 and T 2 values and were insensitive to rejected navigators (< 5% variation for T 1 and T 2 ). As expected from previous studies, in-vivo renal PARMANav T 1 and T 2 values were higher than routine values but showed lower variability, both per subject and between subjects: in the cortex PARMANav T 1 =1601±48ms/T 2 =90.8±5.0ms vs routine T 1 =1307±108ms/T 2 =73.3±8.0ms, while in the medulla PARMANav T 1 =2044±82ms/T 2 =90.3±5.4ms and routine T 1 =1560±122ms/T 2 =67.6±5.8ms. No T 1 or T 2 trend was observed for the different NAWW. Feasibility was demonstrated in patients, where high-quality maps were obtained. Conclusion: PARMANav allows for precise and accurate joint T 1 -T 2 mapping of the kidneys without requiring breath holding. Through-plane motion artifacts were avoided with a navigator, which did not impact the accuracy or precision of the resulting maps.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved abdominal T1 weighted imaging at 0.55TMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2024
- Improved accuracy and precision with three‐parameter simultaneous myocardial T1and T2mapping using multiparametric SASHAMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2022
- Cartesian dictionary‐based native T1and T2mapping of the myocardiumMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2022
- A standard system phantom for magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2021
- Region‐optimized virtual (ROVir) coils: Localization and/or suppression of spatial regions using sensor‐domain beamformingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2021
- Magnetic resonance fingerprinting for simultaneous renal T1 and T2* mapping in a single breath‐holdMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2020
- MR fingerprinting for rapid quantification of myocardial T1, T2, and proton spin densityMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2016
- Simultaneous measurement of tissue oxygen level‐dependent (TOLD) and blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) effects in abdominal tissue oxygenation level studiesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2013
- Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heartMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2004
- MR in renal disease: Importance of cortical–medullary distinctionMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1987