Task and instrumentation variables as factors jeopardizing the validity of published group communication research, 1970–1971
Author:
- 1 June 1974
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Speech Monographs
- Vol. 41 (2) , 169-178
Abstract
This paper evaluates published small group research in speech communication during 1970 and 1971. Special attention was given to the way tasks were defined, controlled, and manipulated as well as the way instrument reliability was computed and reported in eight small group studies published during this period. Examples of failure to report instrument reliability and independent support of validity suggest a lack of emphasis on measurement. It is argued that (a) investigators can decrease the possibility of unwanted error by taking greater care in selecting and using tasks, (b) more accurate and complete reports of reliability should be made, and (c) greater recognition of the interdependent nature of theory and measurement should be achieved.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of semantic differential scales: The role of factor analysisWestern Speech, 1971
- Communication Research and the Task–Oriented GrosupJournal of Communication, 1971
- On the McCroskey scales for the measurement ofethosCentral States Speech Journal, 1971
- The status of small group researchQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1970
- Task and group characteristics as factors influencing group performanceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969
- Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral researchActa Psychologica, 1969
- Effects of task characteristics on group productsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968
- Task effects on group interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966
- Predicting group task effectiveness from member characteristics.Psychological Bulletin, 1964
- Some Factors Affecting the Behaviors of Members of Problem-Solving GroupsSociometry, 1960