In the dark? Preparing for the PhD viva
Authors:
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Quality Assurance in Education
- Vol. 10 (2) , 86-97
Abstract
In a climate of tightening quality controls and audits within higher education, the transparency of doctoral examination practices is increasingly the subject of scrutiny. Examines quality and standards issues that arise in relation to setting up, and preparing for, the examination of the research PhD. Specifically, the ways in which the examination is organised and the ways in which candidates prepare for the viva are addressed. The discussion draws on three sets of data collected between 1999 and 2001: institutional policy data; questionnaire data from PhD candidates, examiners and supervisors; and interview data with candidates before and after their PhD vivas.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Back to Basics: A consideration of the purposes of the PhD vivaAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2001
- Doctoral Students' Access to Research Cultures-are some more unequal than others?Studies in Higher Education, 2000
- Examining the Doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in BritainStudies in Higher Education, 2000
- Technicians and scholars in pursuit of the PhD: some reflections on doctoral studyResearch Papers in Education, 2000
- Creating a Delicate Balance: the doctoral supervisor's dilemmasTeaching in Higher Education, 1998
- Critical Mass and Pedagogic Continuity: studies in academic habitusBritish Journal of Sociology of Education, 1997
- A complex craft: United Kingdom PhD supervision in the social sciencesResearch in Post-Compulsory Education, 1997
- Critical mass and doctoral research: Reflections on the Harris reportStudies in Higher Education, 1997
- Change and the Social Science PhD: supervisors’ responsesOxford Review of Education, 1995
- Establishing Boundaries: problems and solutions in managing the PhD supervisor's roleCambridge Journal of Education, 1994