Effects of Stimulus Order on Discrimination Processes in Comparative and Equality Judgements: Data and Models
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 June 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 67 (6) , 1121-1150
Abstract
In typical discrimination experiments, participants are presented with a constant standard and a variable comparison stimulus and their task is to judge which of these two stimuli is larger (comparative judgement). In these experiments, discrimination sensitivity depends on the temporal order of these stimuli (Type B effect) and is usually higher when the standard precedes rather than follows the comparison. Here, we outline how two models of stimulus discrimination can account for the Type B effect, namely the weighted difference model (or basic Sensation Weighting model) and the Internal Reference Model. For both models, the predicted psychometric functions for comparative judgements as well as for equality judgements, in which participants indicate whether they perceived the two stimuli to be equal or not equal, are derived and it is shown that the models also predict a Type B effect for equality judgements. In the empirical part, the models’ predictions are evaluated. To this end, participants performed a duration discrimination task with comparative judgements and with equality judgements. In line with the models’ predictions, a Type B effect was observed for both judgement types. In addition, a time-order error, as indicated by shifts of the psychometric functions, and differences in response times were observed only for the equality judgement. Since both models entail distinct additional predictions, it seems worthwhile for future research to unite the two models into one conceptual framework.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trial-by-trial updating of an internal reference in discrimination tasks: Evidence from effects of stimulus order and trial sequenceAttention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2012
- Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: Routines for MATLAB and RBehavior Research Methods, 2012
- Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: A reply to Schneider (2011)Journal of Vision, 2011
- A model for the time-order error in contrast discriminationQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2011
- Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: Attention alters appearanceJournal of Vision, 2010
- Short-term memory for time in children and adults: A behavioral study and a modelJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007
- The Psychophysics ToolboxSpatial Vision, 1997
- The time-order error in judgments of duration.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1977
- Time errors are perceptualPsychological Research, 1977
- Intensity Perception. I. Preliminary Theory of Intensity ResolutionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969