Two different technical criteria for determining the minimum miscibility pressures (MMPs) from the slim-tube and coreflood tests
Authors:
- Kaiqiang ZhangKZKaiqiang Zhang
- Yongan GuYGYongan Gu
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intelligent model for prediction of CO2 – Reservoir oil minimum miscibility pressureFuel, 2013
- Oil recovery mechanisms and asphaltene precipitation phenomenon in immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding processesFuel, 2013
- Effects of Four Important Factors on the Measured Minimum Miscibility Pressure and First-Contact Miscibility PressureJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013
- Computational procedure for determination of minimum miscibility pressure of reservoir oilFuel, 2013
- Physicochemical Characterization of Produced Oils and Gases in Immiscible and Miscible CO2 Flooding ProcessesEnergy & Fuels, 2012
- Comparative evaluation of immiscible, near miscible and miscible CO2 huff-n-puff to enhance oil recovery from a single matrix–fracture system (experimental and simulation studies)Fuel, 2012
- A comparison of CO2 minimum miscibility pressure determinations for Weyburn crude oilJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2001
- Global approach for calculation of minimum miscibility pressureFluid Phase Equilibria, 1998
- Analytical calculation of minimum miscibility pressureFluid Phase Equilibria, 1997
- Measuring CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures: Slim-Tube or Rising-Bubble Method?Energy & Fuels, 1996