Temozolomide in Combination With Interferon-Alfa Versus Temozolomide Alone in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma: A Randomized, Phase III, Multicenter Study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group
Authors:
- Konstanze SpiethKSKonstanze Spieth
- Ulrike LeiterULUlrike Leiter
- Cornelia MauchCMCornelia Mauch
- Peter von Den DrieschPDPeter von Den Driesch
- Thomas VogtTVThomas Vogt
- Ruthild LinseRLRuthild Linse
- Wolfgang TilgenWTWolfgang Tilgen
- Dirk SchadendorfDSDirk Schadendorf
- Jürgen C. BeckerJBJürgen C. Becker
- Günther SebastianGSGünther Sebastian
- Sven KrengelSKSven Krengel
- 10 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (35) , 9001-9007
Abstract
Purpose: Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-α) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-α in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Patients and Methods: Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-α (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week). Results: Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-α arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-α arm (P < .001). Conclusion: In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-α leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years?European Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Temozolomide and interferon alpha2b in metastatic melanoma stage IVBritish Journal of Dermatology, 2004
- Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Malignant Glioma PatientsClinical Cancer Research, 2004
- Complete Response of Multiple Melanoma Brain Metastases after Treatment with TemozolomideOncology Research and Treatment, 2004
- Temozolomide as prophylaxis for melanoma brain metastasesMelanoma Research, 2004
- A Phase II Trial of Temozolomide and IFN- α in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Interferon & Cytokine Research, 2004
- Randomized Phase II Study of Temozolomide Given Every 8 Hours or Daily With Either Interferon Alfa-2b or Thalidomide in Metastatic Malignant MelanomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Temozolomide in combination with interferon α‐2b in patients with metastatic melanomaCancer, 2002
- Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorinEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Epidemiology of melanomaClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 2000