“I Have Nothing to Complain About!”: System Justification Tendencies Undermines Collective Action Through Adherence to Hierarchy-Legitimizing Ideologies / “No tengo de qué quejarme”: Las tendencias a la justificación del sistema debilitan la acción colectiva a través de la adherencia a ideologías que legitiman la jerarquía
- 1 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Social Psychology: Revista de Psicología Social
- Vol. 39 (1) , 187-215
Abstract
All societies are organized based on hierarchies, where some groups have more power than others. Although some may aspire for a hierarchy-free world, hierarchies are inevitable and strongly resistant to changes. People may feel motivated to see hierarchical social systems as fair, legitimate, and justified, and endorse system-justifying ideologies, such as social dominance orientation (SDO), contributing to the maintenance and perpetuation of intergroup inequality. Belief in the social system’s fairness and legitimacy should increase acceptance and support for the existing society-based social stratification and status hierarchies, weakening support for collective action towards social change. We tested this idea, with two studies, conducted on members of the general population ( N = 121) and on members of a disadvantaged group highly mobilized for social change towards intergroup equality ( N = 154). Results showed that system justification undermines collective action through SDO (full mediation). We discuss the implications of including ideological processes when predicting collective action.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PD/BD/128211/2016)
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective actionEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2018
- Stability and the justification of social inequalityEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2013
- Social dominance orientation: Cause or ‘mere effect’?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011
- Does group efficacy increase group identification? Resolving their paradoxical relationshipJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2010
- Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality Correspond to Different Psychological MotivesSocial Justice Research, 2010
- Group status, perceptions of threat, and support for social inequalityJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2009
- The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008
- Group domination and inequality in context: evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianismEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2006
- The Role of Personality and Group Factors in Explaining PrejudiceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001
- Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality as Independent Predictors of Self-Esteem, Ethnocentrism, and Social Policy Attitudes among African Americans and European AmericansJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000