Networked corporate advocacy in a polarized public arena: analyzing discourse networks of U.S. Fortune 500 companies on controversial issues
- 18 December 2024
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Communication
- Vol. 75 (2) , 148-160
Abstract
This study investigates how U.S. Fortune 500 corporate social advocacy (CSA) discourse on multiple contentious issues is associated with public attention on Twitter/X. Our theoretical framework elucidates three discourse types and conceptualizes the diversity, structure, and stability of discourse coalition networks. Utilizing computational methods and dynamic network analysis of 43,791 corporate tweets over two years, findings reveal a prevalent use of aspirational communication in addressing climate change and healthcare disparities. Functional discourse is predominantly employed in tweets on racial equality and COVID-19 vaccination, while localization discourse is concentrated in tweets about gender/sexuality. Network analysis shows that discourse coalitions exist across industries, with a convergence in discourse types and low temporal stability in network compositions. Most discourse types and features of discourse coalition networks are positively associated with public attention to CSA tweets, though these associations vary across different issues.Keywords
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corporate Diversity Statements and Employees’ Online DEI Ratings: An Unsupervised Machine-Learning Text-Mining AnalysisJournal of Business and Psychology, 2022
- Analyzing transitions through the lens of discourse networks: Coal phase-out in GermanyEnvironmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2021
- Politicization of corporations and their environment: Corporations’ social license to operate in a polarized and mediatized societyPublic Relations Review, 2021
- The right side of history, inc.: Social issues management, social license to operate, and the Obergefell v. Hodges decisionPublic Relations Review, 2020
- Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocatorsPublic Relations Review, 2020
- Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responsesPublic Relations Review, 2020
- Building relational capital: The contribution of episodic and relational community engagementPublic Relations Review, 2018
- Structural correlation between communities and core-periphery structures in social networks: Evidence from Twitter dataExpert Systems with Applications, 2018
- Relationship networks as strategic issues management: An issue-stage framework of social movement organization network strategiesPublic Relations Review, 2017
- “Why Should We Care about Marriage Equality?”: Political Advocacy as a Part of Corporate ResponsibilityJournal of Business Ethics, 2015