Reliable measures of rest-activity rhythm fragmentation: how many days are needed?
Authors:
Open Access
- 19 October 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Review of Aging and Physical Activity
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
Background: A more fragmented, less stable rest-activity rhythm (RAR) is emerging as a risk factor for health. Accelerometer devices are increasingly used to measure RAR fragmentation using metrics such as inter-daily stability (IS), intradaily variability (IV), transition probabilities (TP), self-similarity parameter (α), and activity balance index (ABI). These metrics were proposed in the context of long period of wear but, in real life, non-wear might introduce measurement bias. This study aims to determine the minimum number of valid days to obtain reliable fragmentation metrics. Methods: Wrist-worn accelerometer data were drawn from the Whitehall accelerometer sub-study (age: 60 to 83 years) to simulate different non-wear patterns. Pseudo-simulated data with different numbers of valid days (one to seven), defined as < 1/3 of non-wear during both day and night periods, and with omission or imputation of non-wear periods were compared against complete data using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE). Results: Five days with valid data (97.8% of participants) and omission of non-wear periods allowed an ICC ≥ 0.75 and MAPE ≤ 15%, acceptable cut points for reliability, for IS and ABI; this number was lower for TPs (two-three days), α and IV (four days). Overall, imputation of data did not provide better estimates. Findings were consistent across age and sex groups. Conclusions: The number of days of wrist accelerometer data with at least 2/3 of wear time for both day and night periods varies from two (TPs) to five (IS, ABI) days for reliable RAR measures among older adults.Keywords
Funding Information
- Wellcome Trust (221854/Z/20/Z)
- UK Medical Research Council (R024227)
- UK Medical Research Council (S011676)
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG056477, R01AG062553)
- European Union (ERC 101043884)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of physical activity and sedentary behaviour dimensions that predict mortality risk in older adults: development of a machine learning model in the Whitehall II accelerometer sub-study and external validation in the CoLaus studyeClinicalMedicine, 2022
- Actigraphic sleep monitoring in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A meta-analysisJournal of Affective Disorders, 2022
- Effect of missing data on short time series and their application in the characterization of surface temperature by detrended fluctuation analysisComputers & Geosciences, 2021
- Regional Gray Matter Volume Links Rest-Activity Rhythm Fragmentation With Past Cognitive DeclineThe American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2020
- Reproducibility of Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity and Sedentary TimeAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017
- Effect of missing RR-interval data on nonlinear heart rate variability analysisComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2012
- Another look at measures of forecast accuracyInternational Journal of Forecasting, 2006
- Circadian rest—activity rhythm disturbances in alzheimer's diseaseBiological Psychiatry, 1996
- Alterations in the circadian rest-activity rhythm in aging and Alzheimer's diseaseBiological Psychiatry, 1990
- Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variableComputers in Biology and Medicine, 1989