Pharmacological interventions in hypoactive delirium: mapping the evidence through a scoping review
Authors:
- Sofía Pérez-LalindeSPSofía Pérez-Lalinde
- Sebastián Mariño-TibochaSMSebastián Mariño-Tibocha
- Carlos CifuentesCCCarlos Cifuentes
- David VásquezDVDavid Vásquez
- Sofía Santos-SimancasSSSofía Santos-Simancas
- Eduardo BallesterosEBEduardo Ballesteros
- Sebastián Fernández de CastroSCSebastián Fernández de Castro
- Lina María González-BallesterosLGLina María González-Ballesteros
Open Access
- 10 March 2026
- journal article
- hot topic
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
- Vol. 13 (1) , 6
Abstract
Purpose of review: Hypoactive delirium is a frequently underrecognized subtype associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet it lacks clearly established pharmacologic treatment strategies. This scoping review aimed to map and critically examine the existing evidence on pharmacological interventions specifically evaluated for hypoactive delirium in hospitalized adults, focusing on symptom severity and clinical outcomes. Recent findings: The available literature is limited and heterogeneous. Identified studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and recent systematic reviews evaluating agents such as antipsychotics, dexmedetomidine, melatonin, flumazenil, and methylphenidate. However, most trials were small, methodologically diverse, and not specifically powered for the hypoactive subtype. Evidence supporting atypical antipsychotics remains inconsistent, and no high-quality randomized trials demonstrate clear benefit for routine use in hypoactive delirium. Alternative agents such as flumazenil and methylphenidate have been explored in limited or exploratory contexts, without consistent improvement in clinically meaningful outcomes. Summary: Current evidence does not support the routine use of any pharmacologic agent as a standard treatment for hypoactive delirium. Existing studies are constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and outcome measures, and overlap across systematic reviews and primary trials. Further well-designed, subtype-specific randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether targeted pharmacologic strategies can improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Pontifical Xavierian University
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delirium in Elderly Hospitalized Patients: Analyzing Clinical and Social Determinants in a Colombian Retrospective CohortInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2025
- Mortality-related factors in older adults with delirium: A prospective observational studyGeriatric Nursing, 2024
- Suvorexant for Reduction of Delirium in Older Adults After HospitalizationJAMA Network Open, 2024
- Exploring Antipsychotic Use for Delirium Management in Adults in Hospital, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation and Aged Care Settings: A Systematic Literature ReviewDrugs & Aging, 2024
- Why We Must Prevent and Appropriately Manage DeliriumAMA Journal of Ethics, 2023
- Predisposing and Precipitating Factors Associated With DeliriumJAMA Network Open, 2023
- Pharmacologic treatment of delirium symptoms: A systematic reviewGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2022
- The economic cost of delirium: A systematic review and quality assessmentAlzheimer's & Dementia, 2021
- A roadmap to advance delirium research: Recommendations from the NIDUS Scientific Think TankAlzheimer's & Dementia, 2020
- Impact of Quetiapine Treatment on Duration of Hypoactive Delirium in Critically Ill Adults: A Retrospective AnalysisPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2015