Eduardo Ballesteros
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Eduardo Ballesteros has a total of 17 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Lina María González-Ballesteros
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
2 shared publications - Carlos Cifuentes
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
1 shared publication - David Vásquez
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
1 shared publication - Dinabel Peralta-Reich
Northwell Health, Pediatrics NY. New York Weight Wellness medicine New York
1 shared publication - Juan David Junco
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health Faculty of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá Colombia
1 shared publication - Julieta Bermúdez-Gómez
Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
- Vol. 13 (1) , 6
Pharmacological interventions in hypoactive delirium: mapping the evidence through a scoping review
Purpose of review: Hypoactive delirium is a frequently underrecognized subtype associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet it lacks clearly established pharmacologic treatment strategies. This scoping review aimed to map and critically examine the existing evidence on pharmacological interventions specifically evaluated for hypoactive delirium in hospitalized adults, focusing on symptom severity and clinical outcomes. Recent findings: The available literature is limited and heterogeneous. Identified studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and recent systematic reviews evaluating agents such as antipsychotics, dexmedetomidine, melatonin, flumazenil, and methylphenidate. However, most trials were small, methodologically diverse, and not specifically powered for the hypoactive subtype. Evidence supporting atypical antipsychotics remains inconsistent, and no high-quality randomized trials demonstrate clear benefit for routine use in hypoactive delirium. Alternative agents such as flumazenil and methylphenidate have been explored in limited or exploratory contexts, without consistent improvement in clinically meaningful outcomes. Summary: Current evidence does not support the routine use of any pharmacologic agent as a standard treatment for hypoactive delirium. Existing studies are constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and outcome measures, and overlap across systematic reviews and primary trials. Further well-designed, subtype-specific randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether targeted pharmacologic strategies can improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
- 10 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
- Vol. 13 (1) , 6
Open AccessPharmacological interventions in hypoactive delirium: mapping the evidence through a scoping review
Purpose of review: Hypoactive delirium is a frequently underrecognized subtype associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet it lacks clearly established pharmacologic treatment strategies. This scoping review aimed to map and critically examine the existing evidence on pharmacological interventions specifically evaluated for hypoactive delirium in hospitalized adults, focusing on symptom severity and clinical outcomes. Recent findings: The available literature is limited and heterogeneous. Identified studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and recent systematic reviews evaluating agents such as antipsychotics, dexmedetomidine, melatonin, flumazenil, and methylphenidate. However, most trials were small, methodologically diverse, and not specifically powered for the hypoactive subtype. Evidence supporting atypical antipsychotics remains inconsistent, and no high-quality randomized trials demonstrate clear benefit for routine use in hypoactive delirium. Alternative agents such as flumazenil and methylphenidate have been explored in limited or exploratory contexts, without consistent improvement in clinically meaningful outcomes. Summary: Current evidence does not support the routine use of any pharmacologic agent as a standard treatment for hypoactive delirium. Existing studies are constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria and outcome measures, and overlap across systematic reviews and primary trials. Further well-designed, subtype-specific randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether targeted pharmacologic strategies can improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.
- Open Access
The Effect of Psychotherapy in the Management of Obesity: An umbrella review
Objective: To assess the impact of psychotherapy on obesity treatment in outpatient settings. Methods: The study targets adults with a BMI of 30 or higher, comparing psychotherapeutic interventions to usual care or no treatment. Key outcomes include weight loss, adverse events, depression, quality of life, and long-term BMI changes. Extensive database searches were conducted. Results: Out of 1,334 articles reviewed, only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria, emphasizing the scarcity of relevant research. These studies primarily focused on behavioral and cognitive-behavioral strategies. Results showed that combining behavior therapy with diet/exercise led to greater weight loss than diet/exercise alone. Studies on cognitive therapy and general psychotherapy were less frequent and yielded weaker evidence. Despite varied methodologies, the findings suggest that behavioral therapy combined with dietary and exercise interventions offers improved outcomes, though more research is needed to strengthen these conclusions. Conclusions: The study found that combining behavioral therapy with diet and exercise resulted in greater weight loss than diet and exercise alone. However, research on the impact of psychotherapy on obesity is limited, as only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria. Cognitive therapies and general psychotherapy provided weaker evidence. Therefore, further research is necessary to validate these findings and investigate alternative psychotherapeutic methods for treating obesity.
Open AccessThe Effect of Psychotherapy in the Management of Obesity: An umbrella review
Objective: To assess the impact of psychotherapy on obesity treatment in outpatient settings. Methods: The study targets adults with a BMI of 30 or higher, comparing psychotherapeutic interventions to usual care or no treatment. Key outcomes include weight loss, adverse events, depression, quality of life, and long-term BMI changes. Extensive database searches were conducted. Results: Out of 1,334 articles reviewed, only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria, emphasizing the scarcity of relevant research. These studies primarily focused on behavioral and cognitive-behavioral strategies. Results showed that combining behavior therapy with diet/exercise led to greater weight loss than diet/exercise alone. Studies on cognitive therapy and general psychotherapy were less frequent and yielded weaker evidence. Despite varied methodologies, the findings suggest that behavioral therapy combined with dietary and exercise interventions offers improved outcomes, though more research is needed to strengthen these conclusions. Conclusions: The study found that combining behavioral therapy with diet and exercise resulted in greater weight loss than diet and exercise alone. However, research on the impact of psychotherapy on obesity is limited, as only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria. Cognitive therapies and general psychotherapy provided weaker evidence. Therefore, further research is necessary to validate these findings and investigate alternative psychotherapeutic methods for treating obesity.