Single‐stage retrograde endoscopic common bile duct stone removal might be sufficient in moderate acute cholangitis with a stone size ≤12 mm: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching
Open Access
- 7 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Advances in Digestive Medicine
- Vol. 7 (4) , 188-194
Abstract
Studies elucidating the efficacy and safety of single‐stage endoscopic treatment for acute moderate cholangitis with choledocholithiasis are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of single‐stage endoscopic treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stone removal in patients with moderate cholangitis to determine the rates of successful stone extraction and complications. A retrospective chart review was conducted for all consecutive patients (n = 632) undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for CBD stone removal between January 2010 and September 2013 at the study institution. A total of 346 patients excluded based on the following criteria: procedural failure requiring an anatomy‐modifying operation, stenosis of the pyloric ring, tumor‐related obstruction, treatment requiring only biliary drainage, failure to locate the papilla, intolerance due to inadequate sedation, CBD stone > 12 mm, CBD sludge, and non‐naïve papilla in ERCP. The remaining 286 patients were randomly matched at a 1:2 ratio using propensity score together with age and sex with the Number Cruncher Statistical System statistical software. After propensity score matching, there were 90 and 134 patients in the moderate and no/mild cholangitis groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics and endoscopic findings were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of complete stone extraction was similar between the moderate and no/mild cholangitis groups (90.0% vs 91.0%, P = .793). Additionally, the complication rates were comparable between the moderate and no/mild cholangitis groups (post‐ERCP pancreatitis, 13.3% vs 10.4%, P = .542; pneumonia, 4.4% vs 1.5%, P = .183; perforation, 0% vs 1.5%, P = .243; and mortality, 2.2% vs 0.7%, P = .350). However, there was a trend for higher bleeding rate in the moderate cholangitis group compared with the no/mild cholangitis group (2.2% vs 0%, P = .084). Single‐stage retrograde endoscopic CBD stone removal in patients with moderate cholangitis and choledocholithiasis sized ≤12 mm might be adequate based on the high success rate (90.0%) for stone removal and low complication rates.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes Associated With Timing of ERCP in Acute Cholangitis Secondary to CholedocholithiasisJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2018
- Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitisCanadian Journal Of Surgery, 2016
- Safety of immediate endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute suppurative cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasisWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2016
- Decreasing Mortality From Acute Biliary Diseases That Require Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Nationwide Cohort StudyClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2014
- TG13 flowchart for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitisJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 2013
- TG13 current terminology, etiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitisJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 2013
- Delayed and Unsuccessful Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Are Associated With Worse Outcomes in Patients With Acute CholangitisClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2012
- The role of endoscopy in the management of choledocholithiasisGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2011
- Management of Ascending CholangitisGastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America, 2007
- Randomised study of endoscopic biliary endoprosthesis versus duct clearance for bileduct stones in high-risk patientsThe Lancet, 1996