Yi-Chun Chiu

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and FDG PET/CT in the preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and determine whether their innovative coordination achieves better prediction. In total, 100 patients diagnosed with ESCC, 57 without (CRT^[−]sub) and 43 with (CRT^[+]sub) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, undergoing EUS and FDG PET/CT, followed by surgical resection of the tumor, were included in this analysis. EUS classified T-stages based on the depth of primary tumor invasion, and FDG PET/CT used thresholded maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max) classifications. By employing pathology results as the reference standard, we assessed the accuracy of EUS and FDG PET/CT, evaluated their concordance using the κ statistic, and conducted a comparative analysis between the two modalities through McNemar’s chi-square test. FDG PET/CT had higher overall accuracy than EUS (for CRT^[−]sub: 71.9%, κ = 0.56 vs. 56.1%, κ = 0.31, p = 0.06; for CRT^[+]sub: 65.1%, κ = 0.50 vs. 18.6%, κ = 0.05, p < 0.01) in predicting pT- and ypT-stage. Our proposed method of incorporating both FDG PET/CT and EUS information could achieve higher accuracies in differentiating between early and locally advanced disease in the CRT^[−]sub group (82.5%) and determining residual viable tumor in the CRT^[+]sub group (83.7%) than FDG PET/CT or EUS alone. FDG PET/CT had a better diagnostic ability than EUS to predict the (y)pT-stage of ESCC. Our complementary method, which combines the advantages of both imaging modalities, can deliver higher accuracy for clinical applications of ESCC.

Background: Evidence supporting the feasibility of single-stage stone removal in patients with a moderate grade of acute cholangitis remains insufficient. The maximal size of a common bile-duct stone suitable for removal during a single-stage ERCP in a moderate grade of acute cholangitis is unknown. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 196 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-naïve patients diagnosed with acute cholangitis and choledocholithiasis. For eligible patients, single-stage treatment involved stone removal at initial ERCP. Results: A total of 123 patients were included in the final analysis. The success rate of complete stone extraction was similar between patients with mild and moderate grades of acute cholangitis (89.2% vs. 95.9%; p = 0. 181). Complication rates were comparable between the two groups. In the moderate grade of the cholangitis group, among patients who underwent early single-stage ERCP, the length of hospitalization declined as short as the patients in the mild grade of cholangitis (10.6 ± 6.2 vs. 10.1 ± 5.1 days; p = 0.408). In the multivariate analysis, early ERCP indicated shorter hospitalization times (≤10 days) (odds ratio (OR), 3.981; p = 0.001). A stone size less than 1.5 cm presented a high success rate (98.0%) for complete stone removal. Conclusions: Single-stage retrograde endoscopic stone removal in mild and moderate grades of acute cholangitis may be safe and effective, which can obviate the requirement for a second session, thus reducing medical expenses. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03754491.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the leading cause of death in Taiwan despite mandatory CRC screening programs for early detection. The development of CRC between periods of follow‐up remains a Taiwanese health and economic burden. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between consequent progression of polyps and interval CRC and identify potential risk factors. This retrospective chart review study reviewed 1671 CRC patients between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2018, in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital for interval CRC analysis. Interval CRC is defined as CRC diagnosed within 5 years after a negative colonoscopy. We further analyzed potential risk factors associated with interval CRC such as sex, age, underlying disease, and previous pathologic type of polyps by univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 44 patients developed interval CRC in this study (2.63%). Ten patients were from the proctologist division and five from the gastroenterology department. Mean diagnostic interval was 919.45 ± 547.78 days in male and 897.87 ± 586.14 days in female patients. Multivariate analysis showed that right‐side colon polyp demonstrated independent risk factors for interval CRC development in our observation (P < .001; hazard ratio (HR), 3.897; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.934‐7.780). In conclusion, interval CRC prevalence in a cohort is 2.63%. Location of polyps over the right colon is relevant to interval CRC occurrence.

Studies elucidating the efficacy and safety of single‐stage endoscopic treatment for acute moderate cholangitis with choledocholithiasis are limited. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of single‐stage endoscopic treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stone removal in patients with moderate cholangitis to determine the rates of successful stone extraction and complications. A retrospective chart review was conducted for all consecutive patients (n = 632) undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for CBD stone removal between January 2010 and September 2013 at the study institution. A total of 346 patients excluded based on the following criteria: procedural failure requiring an anatomy‐modifying operation, stenosis of the pyloric ring, tumor‐related obstruction, treatment requiring only biliary drainage, failure to locate the papilla, intolerance due to inadequate sedation, CBD stone > 12 mm, CBD sludge, and non‐naïve papilla in ERCP. The remaining 286 patients were randomly matched at a 1:2 ratio using propensity score together with age and sex with the Number Cruncher Statistical System statistical software. After propensity score matching, there were 90 and 134 patients in the moderate and no/mild cholangitis groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics and endoscopic findings were comparable between the two groups. The success rate of complete stone extraction was similar between the moderate and no/mild cholangitis groups (90.0% vs 91.0%, P = .793). Additionally, the complication rates were comparable between the moderate and no/mild cholangitis groups (post‐ERCP pancreatitis, 13.3% vs 10.4%, P = .542; pneumonia, 4.4% vs 1.5%, P = .183; perforation, 0% vs 1.5%, P = .243; and mortality, 2.2% vs 0.7%, P = .350). However, there was a trend for higher bleeding rate in the moderate cholangitis group compared with the no/mild cholangitis group (2.2% vs 0%, P = .084). Single‐stage retrograde endoscopic CBD stone removal in patients with moderate cholangitis and choledocholithiasis sized ≤12 mm might be adequate based on the high success rate (90.0%) for stone removal and low complication rates.

The removal of large bile duct stones (> 15 mm) by conventional endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) can be challenging, requiring mechanical lithotripsy (ML) in addition to EST or EPBD. The primary complication of ML is basket and stone impaction, which can lead to complications such as pancreatitis and cholangitis. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy of limited EST plus endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EST-EPLBD) for large bile duct stone extraction with an extent of cutting < 1/2 the length of the papillary mound. We enrolled 185 patients with ≥15 mm bile duct stones who received EST, EPLBD and limited EST-EPLBD treatment from January 1, 2010 to February 28, 2018, at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Kaohsiung, Taiwan). All patients were categorized into three groups: EST group (n = 31), EPLBD group (n = 96), and limited EST-EPLBD group (n = 58). The primary outcome variables were the success rate of complete stone removal and complications. The limited EST-EPLBD group exhibited a higher success rate of the first-session treatment compared with the EST and EPLBD groups (98.3% vs. 83.9% vs. 86.5%; P = 0.032) but required a longer procedure time (32 (12–61) min vs. 23.5 (17–68) min vs. 25.0 (14–60) min; P = 0.001). The need for ML during the procedure was 4 (12.9%) in the EST group, 10 (10.4%) in the EPLBD group and 2 (3.4%) in the limited EST-EPLBD group. Post-procedure bleeding in the EST group was more common than that in the limited EST-EPLBD group (9.7% vs. 0%; P = 0.038). Furthermore, dilated bile duct was the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in the limited EST-EPLBD group. Limited EST-EPLBD exhibits a higher success rate but requires marginally longer procedure time for the first-session treatment. Furthermore, dilated bile duct is the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in patients undergoing limited EST-EPLBD.