Optimization schemes for endovascular repair with parallel technique based on hemodynamic analyses

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Endovascular repair with parallel stent‐grafts (SG) is a challenging technique that reconstructs the luminal flow pathways by implanting parallel‐placed SGs into the vessel. After treatment, occlusion and shifting of the parallel SGs are sometimes reported, which could be fatal and difficult to be re‐operated. These issues are highly related to the local hemodynamic conditions in the stented region. In this study, a patient case treated by the octopus endograft technique (a head‐SG with three limb‐SGs) and experienced limb‐SG occlusion is studied. 3‐D models are established based on computed tomography (CT) angiography datasets pretreatment and posttreatment as well as during follow‐ups. Hemodynamic quantities such as pressure drop, wall shear stress‐related parameters, and flow division in limb‐SGs and visceral arteries are quantitatively investigated. Optimizations on the length of the head‐SG and diameter of the limb‐SGs are analyzed based on various scenarios. The results indicate that when reconstructing the flow pathways via octopus stenting, it is important to ensure the flow distribution as physiologically required with this new morphology. Position (or length) of the head‐SG and diameter of the limb‐SGs play an important role in controlling flow division, and high time average wall shear stress (TAWSS) around the head‐SG acts as a main factor for graft immigration. This study, by proposing optimization suggestions with hemodynamic analyses for a specific case, implicates that pretreatment SG scenarios may assist in wise selection and placement of the device and thus may improve long‐term effectiveness of this kind of challenging endovascular repair techniques.
Funding Information
  • Beijing Nova Program (Z181100006218008)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471752, 81770465)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2017YFC0107900)

This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit: