Overcoming the current issues surrounding device leads: reducing the complications during extraction
Authors:
- 11 May 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Medical Devices
- Vol. 14 (6) , 469-480
Abstract
Introduction: The implantation rate of cardiac implantable electronic devices has consistently increased in the last 20 years, as have the related complication rates. The most relevant issue is the removal of pacing and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads, which a few months after implantation tend to develop intravascular fibrosis, often making extraction a challenging and risky procedure. Areas covered: The transvenous lead extraction (TLE) scenario is constantly evolving. TLE is a key procedure in lead management strategies. Many efforts have been made to develop new TLE approaches and techniques allowing a safe and effective procedure for patients. The increasing rate of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations and of CIED related complications highlight the importance of TLE. Lead related- and patient-related factors may change the future of extractions. We review the current status of TLE, focusing on the strategies available to perform the optimal procedure in the right patient and reducing procedure related complications. Expert commentary: Understanding the importance of an accurate TLE risk stratification is mandatory to optimize the procedural risk-to-benefits ratio. The use of adequate tools, techniques and approaches, and appropriate training are cornerstones for the achievement of safer procedures.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTRolled) Registry—Shedding light on transvenous lead extraction real-world practice in EuropeHerzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2013
- Transvenous Extraction of Pacemaker Leads in Infective Endocarditis With Vegetations ≥20 mm: Our ExperienceClinical Cardiology, 2011
- Large, Single‐Center Experience in Transvenous Coronary Sinus Lead Extraction: Procedural Outcomes and Predictors for Mechanical DilatationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2011
- A Modified Transvenous Single Mechanical Dilatation Technique to Remove a Chronically Implanted Active‐Fixation Coronary Sinus Pacing LeadPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2011
- Lead Extraction in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease PatientsCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2010
- Transvenous Extraction Performance of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Covered ICD Leads in Comparison to Traditional ICD Leads in HumansPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2010
- Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacemaker lead extractionEP Europace, 2009
- A single-centre experience of over one thousand lead extractionsEP Europace, 2009
- Transvenous removal of pacing and implantable cardiac defibrillating leads using single sheath mechanical dilatation and multiple venous approaches: high success rate and safety in more than 2000 leadsEuropean Heart Journal, 2008
- Pacemaker and ICD lead extraction with electrosurgical dissection sheaths and standard transvenous extraction systems: results of a randomized trialEP Europace, 2007