Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- and low-income countries: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT)
Authors:
- Galia S. MoranGMGalia S. Moran
- Jasmine KalhaJKJasmine Kalha
- Annabel S. Mueller-StierlinAMAnnabel S. Mueller-Stierlin
- Reinhold KilianRKReinhold Kilian
- Silvia KrummSKSilvia Krumm
- Mike SladeMSMike Slade
- Ashleigh CharlesACAshleigh Charles
- Candelaria MahlkeCMCandelaria Mahlke
- Rebecca NixdorfRNRebecca Nixdorf
- David BasangwaDBDavid Basangwa
- Juliet NakkuJNJuliet Nakku
- Richard MpangoRMRichard Mpango
Open Access
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-15
Abstract
Background: Peer support is an established intervention involving a person recovering from mental illness supporting others with mental illness. Peer support is an under-used resource in global mental health. Building upon comprehensive formative research, this study will rigorously evaluate the impact of peer support at multiple levels, including service user outcomes (psychosocial and clinical), peer support worker outcomes (work role and empowerment), service outcomes (cost-effectiveness and return on investment), and implementation outcomes (adoption, sustainability and organisational change).Methods: UPSIDES-RCT is a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of using peer support in developing empowering mental health services (UPSIDES) at four measurement points over 1 year (baseline, 4-, 8- and 12-month follow-up), with embedded process evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis. Research will take place in a range of high-, middle- and low-income countries (Germany, UK, Israel, India, Uganda and Tanzania). The primary outcome is social inclusion of service users with severe mental illness (N = 558;N = 93 per site) at 8-month follow-up, measured with the Social Inclusion Scale. Secondary outcomes include empowerment (using the Empowerment Scale), hope (using the HOPE scale), recovery (using Stages of Recovery) and health and social functioning (using the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales). Mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate mediators and moderators of effect and the implementation experiences of four UPSIDES stakeholder groups (service users, peer support workers, mental health workers and policy makers). A cost-effectiveness analysis examining cost-utility and health budget impact will estimate the value for money of UPSIDES peer support.Discussion: The UPSIDES-RCT will explore the essential components necessary to create a peer support model in mental health care, while providing the evidence required to sustain and eventually scale-up the intervention in different cultural, organisational and resource settings. By actively involving and empowering service users, UPSIDES will move mental health systems toward a recovery orientation, emphasising user-centredness, community participation and the realisation of mental health as a human right.Trial registration: ISRCTN,ISRCTN26008944. Registered on 30 October 2019.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (779263)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health servicesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013
- Development of a short measure of psychological recovery in serious mental illness: the STORI-30Australasian Psychiatry, 2013
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation scienceImplementation Science, 2009
- Qualitative and Mixed Methods Provide Unique Contributions to Outcomes ResearchCirculation, 2009
- Development of a measure of social inclusion for arts and mental health project participantsJournal of Mental Health, 2009
- Assessment of Patients' Competence to Consent to TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- A single European currency for EQ-5D health statesThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2003
- Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost‐effectiveness analysisHealth Economics, 2002
- The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980