Simultaneous screening of targeted and non‐targeted contaminants using an LC‐QTOF‐MS system and automated MS/MS library searching
- 10 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Mass Spectrometry
- Vol. 49 (9) , 878-893
Abstract
Simultaneous high‐resolution full‐scan and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis using time of flight mass spectrometry brings an answer for increasing demand of retrospective and non‐targeted data analysis. Such analysis combined with spectral library searching is a promising tool for targeted and untargeted screening of small molecules. Despite considerable extension of the panel of compounds of tandem mass spectral libraries, the heterogeneity of spectral data poses a major challenge against the effective usage of spectral libraries. Performance evaluation of available LC‐MS/MS libraries will significantly increase credibility in the search results. The present work was aimed to evaluate fluctuation of MS/MS pattern, in the peak intensities distribution together with mass accuracy measurements, and in consequence, performance compliant with ion ratio and mass error criteria as principles in identification processes for targeted and untargeted contaminants at trace levels. Matrix effect and ultra‐trace levels of concentration (from 50 ng l−1 to 1000 ng l−1) were evaluated as potential source of inaccuracy in the performance of spectral matching. Matrix‐matched samples and real samples were screened for proof of applicability. By manual review of data and application of ion ratio and ppm error criteria, false negatives were obtained; this number diminished when in‐house library was used, while with on‐line MS/MS databases 100% of positive samples were found. In our experience, intensity of peaks across spectra was highly correlated to the concentration effect and matrix complexity. In turn, analysis of spectra acquired at trace concentrations and in different matrices results in better performance in providing correct and reliable identification. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combined use of liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry in systematic screening of pesticides and other contaminants in water samplesAnalytica Chimica Acta, 2013
- Mass Spectral Reference Libraries: An Ever-Expanding Resource for Chemical IdentificationAnalytical Chemistry, 2012
- Evaluation of Relevant Time-of-Flight-MS Parameters Used in HPLC/MS Full-Scan Screening Methods for Pesticide ResiduesJournal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2011
- Benefits and pitfalls of the application of screening methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetablesJournal of Chromatography A, 2011
- Computational mass spectrometry for metabolomics: Identification of metabolites and small moleculesAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2010
- Full scan MS in comprehensive qualitative and quantitative residue analysis in food and feed matrices: How much resolving power is required?Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2009
- False‐positive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric confirmation of sebuthylazine residues using the identification points system according to EU directive 2002/657/EC due to a biogenic insecticide in tarragonRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2009
- Identification and confirmation of chemical residues in food by chromatography-mass spectrometry and other techniquesTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2008
- Confirmation of organic micropollutants detected in environmental samples by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry: Achievements and pitfallsTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2006
- Trends in the identification of organic residues and contaminants: EC regulations under revisionTrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2001