10.1 An 8.75GHz Fractional-N Digital PLL with a Reverse-Concavity Variable-Slope DTC Achieving 57.3fsrms Integrated Jitter and −252.4dB FoM
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 18 February 2024
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Vol. 67, 188-190
Abstract
Advanced wireless transceivers exploit high-order modulation schemes to increase data-rates and call for high-spectral-purity frequency synthesizers. To serve this purpose, a fractional-N PLL that removes the time quantization error between the reference and divider signals through a digital-to-time converter (DTC) can be used, a technique which is now widespread among high-performance PLLs (Fig. 10.1.1 top) [1]. However, non-idealities, such as the DTC non-linearity and noise, degrade spectral purity, appearing either as fractional spurs or higher in-band phase noise in the PLL spectrum. Thanks to its simplicity and superior power-jitter trade-off, a variable-slope DTC (VS-DTC) is one of the most used DTC topologies [2–5]. Unfortunately, its linearity is affected by the slope-dependent propagation delay, $T_{2}$, of the output stage. This causes an integral non-linearity $( {DTC}_{INL})$ with a downward concavity (Fig. 10.1.1 bottom-left) [6]. The ${DTC}_{INL}$ is typically improved by adding a fixed capacitance, $C_{FIX},$ at the output of the first stage, which reduces the voltage slope variation [4]. This method essentially trades a better DTC linearity for higher DTC phase noise $( {DTC}_{PN})$ and power consumption. A similar trade-off exists in an alternative DTC architecture, i.e., the constant-slope DTC, that achieves better linearity by keeping a constant voltage slope at the input of the output stage [6] at the cost of a worse power-jitter product [5]. This work introduces a DTC topology, denoted as reverse-concavity variable-slope DTC (RCVS-DTC), which breaks the power-jitter-vs-linearity trade-off. The concept is demonstrated in an 8.75GHz fractional-N digital PLL achieving 57.3fs integrated jitter, a fractional spur of −63.4dBc, and a −252.4dB FoM.
Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A 6.5-to-8GHz Cascaded Dual-Fractional-N Digital PLL Achieving -63.7dBc Fractional Spurs with 50MHz Reference2023
- 4.3 A 76.7fs-lntegrated-Jitter and −71.9dBc In-Band Fractional-Spur Bang-Bang Digital PLL Based on an Inverse-Constant-Slope DTC and FCW Subtractive Dithering2023
- 4.5 A 9.25GHz Digital PLL with Fractional-Spur Cancellation Based on a Multi-DTC Topology2023
- A 2.6-to-4.1GHz Fractional-N Digital PLL Based on a Time-Mode Arithmetic Unit Achieving -249.4dB FoM and -59dBc Fractional Spurs2022
- 32.1 A 365fsrms-Jitter and -63dBc-Fractional Spur 5.3GHz-Ring-DCO-Based Fractional-N DPLL Using a DTC Second/Third- Order Nonlinearity Cancelation and a Probability-Density-Shaping ΔΣM2021
- 32.2 A 14nm Analog Sampling Fractional-N PLL with a Digital-to-Time Converter Range-Reduction Technique Achieving 80fs Integrated Jitter and 93fs at Near-Integer Channels2021
- 32.4 A 104fsrms-Jitter and -61dBc-Fractional Spur 15GHz Fractional-N Subsampling PLL Using a Voltage-Domain Quantization-Error Cancelation Technique2021
- A 28-nm 75-fs rms Analog Fractional-$N$ Sampling PLL With a Highly Linear DTC Incorporating Background DTC Gain Calibration and Reference Clock Duty Cycle CorrectionIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2019
- Power‐jitter trade‐off analysis in digital‐to‐time convertersElectronics Letters, 2017
- A High-Linearity Digital-to-Time Converter Technique: Constant-Slope ChargingIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 2015