The state of Hungarian radiotherapy
Authors:
- József ErfánJEJózsef Erfán
- Judit OlajosJOJudit Olajos
- Szabolcs BellyeiSBSzabolcs Bellyei
- Róbert FarkasRFRóbert Farkas
- Gábor LipositsGLGábor Liposits
- Olga ÉsikOÉOlga Ésik
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- Published by VM Media Group sp. z o.o in Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
- Vol. 10 (4) , 209-216
Abstract
SummaryBackgroundHungary suffers from one of the highest levels of cancer morbidity, with over 700 new cases per 100000 inhabitants per year. This situation necessitates, among others, investigation of the current state of radiotherapeutic care, and its infrastructural and staffing conditions.AimThe aim of this paper is to present the current state of Hungarian radiotherapy.ResultsAlthough the number of radiation treatments increased substantially between 1995 and 2003 (16544 vs. 26316), together with a considerable increase in the linear accelerator equivalent (LAE) value (15.9 vs 29.45), about one-third of the patients who would profit from radiotherapy do not receive this form of treatment. Radiotherapeutic care is provided at 13 centers in 7 geographical regions, with widely varying infrastructural and staffing conditions, characterized by a mean LAE value of 4.2 (range: 0–8.45), a 1 LAE value for a mean of 343500 inhabitants (range: 0–731500), and a mean annual workload of 353 patients per radiation oncologist (range: 255–424), 532 patients per physicist (range: 255–911) and 149 per radiation technologist (range: 71–300). These conditions result in a waiting list of between 0 and 42 days for non-emergency cases and a mean of 260 radiotherapy-treated patients per 100000 inhabitants (range: 111–434) in the different geographical regions, which is far below the expected Hungarian value of 403 radiotherapy-treated cases/year.ConclusionsAttainment of an adequate radiotherapeutic service with an acceptable waiting time throughout Hungary requires the creation of 2 additional centers and the reconstruction of 1 existing center, the provision of 9 new linacs, the replacement of 10 functioning telecobalt units with linacs, and increases of 54% in the number of radiation oncologists, 51% in the number of physicists and 65% in the number of radiation technologistsKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dosimetric verification of dynamic wedged fieldsReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 2003
- Poznań Cancer Centre 1953–2003Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 2003
- Education, science and quality assurance in radiotherapy in EuropeReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 2002
- Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy – description of a method and a review of clinical applicationsReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 2001
- Evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device (target view, ge) as a quality assurance toolReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 2001
- Organization and clinical experience of the pain clinic at the Greatpoland maria skłodowska-curie cancer centre in PoznańReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 1999
- Public – private mix in health and social service policy: lessons learned in the united statesReports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 1999
- 12 Towards a new legal framework for radiotherapy in the EU member states: Is there a scope for harmonisation? Can ESTRO contribute?Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 1999
- Review of the manpower issue in radiation oncologyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP), 1992
- Resources and Productivity in Radiation Oncology in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden During 1987Acta Oncologica, 1991