Federalism and Confidence in Australian Governments During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Open Access
- 17 August 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Publius: The Journal of Federalism
- Vol. 54 (2) , 257-282
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic was the most severe global health crisis for a century. Most advanced democracies introduced restrictions on social interaction to reduce community infection. This article examines how public confidence in Australia’s federal system of government was affected by these restrictions. We use a longitudinal dataset collected nationally between 2020 and 2022 to evaluate how public confidence in both federal and state governments varied with the level of government-imposed COVID-19 restrictions. The results show that confidence in both levels of government surged in the initial stages of the pandemic and remained high for the first year, gradually declining thereafter. Variations in the level of restrictions had a significant longitudinal association with confidence, with a negative relationship with confidence in state governments and a positive relationship with confidence in the federal government. The public clearly distinguished between the responsibilities of the different levels of government in managing the health crisis.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trust During the Early Stages of the 2009 H1N1 PandemicJournal of Health Communication, 2013
- Centralising Dynamics in Australian FederalismAustralian Journal of Politics & History, 2012
- Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the general public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the NetherlandsBMC Public Health, 2011
- Trust in medical organizations predicts pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination behavior and perceived efficacy of protection measures in the Swiss publicEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- The 9/11 effect: Toward a social science of the terrorist threatThe Social Science Journal, 2011
- Americans respond politically to 9/11: Understanding the impact of the terrorist attacks and their aftermath.American Psychologist, 2011
- The Participation Divide? Political Participation, Trust in Government, and E‐government in Australia and New ZealandAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 2009
- The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established DemocraciesInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2005
- Explaining Presidential Popularity: How Ad Hoc Theorizing, Misplaced Emphasis, and Insufficient Care in Measuring One's Variables Refuted Common Sense and Led Conventional Wisdom Down the Path of AnomaliesAmerican Political Science Review, 1978
- Presidential Popularity from Truman to JohnsonAmerican Political Science Review, 1970