Social impact of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm on users and their caregivers
Preprint
Abstract
The efficacious implementation of robotic assistive technologies must be built on a thorough understanding of stakeholders' experiences and perceptions. This study provides an in-depth insight into the experiences and perceptions of users of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm and those of their caregivers. A sample of JACO users (n = 21; Female : 6; Male : 15) and caregivers (n = 11; Female: 2; Male: 9) participated in individual interviews used to gain qualitative insight into the impact of JACO on their day-to-day lives. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive coding process. Thematic analysis was conducted in accordance with the Consortium on Assistive Technology Outcomes Research (CATOR) taxonomy. This article exclusively reports data on the social impact of the JACO wheelchair-mounted robotic arm. In addition, participants completed three questionnaires to gather more objective data for quantitative assessment, these included the Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure (CATOM), a sociodemographic questionnaire, and a home-based questionnaire to assess the social impact of using JACO. Findings pointed to highly varied experiences among participants, including instances of positive, negative, and absence of effects from the use of JACO. Participants' feedback fell within two broad categories, Human Assistance, and Cost and Use of Resources. This study provides nuanced and varied insight into the spectrum of the social impact of using JACO as perceived by users and their caregivers, highlighting the importance of considering each user as an individual with unique experiences and needs. Continued research is needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Usability of mechanical assistive technologies for performing activities involving the upper extremities in individuals with impairments: a systematic reviewDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2024
- Principles of Assistive Technology2020
- Health Conditions: Effect on Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Life Satisfaction After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. A Prospective Observational Registry Cohort StudyArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2018
- Prevalence and Predictors of Burden in Caregivers of People with DementiaThe American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2014
- Patterns of decline in upper limb function of boys and men with DMD: an international surveyJournal of Neurology, 2014
- User evaluation of service robotic arms based on ICF through interviews with people with upper-limb disability2013
- What Is Value in Health Care?New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- A Conceptual Framework of Outcomes for Caregivers of Assistive Technology UsersAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2009
- Toward a Taxonomy of Assistive Technology Device OutcomesAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2005
- Cost-Savings and Economic Benefits Due to the Assistive Robotic Manipulator (ARM)2005