Invalid Response Set and Malingering-Related Assessments in Psychological Injury: Definitions and a Hierarchy of Terms
Top Cited Papers
- 28 January 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Injury and Law
- Vol. 18 (1) , 3-18
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Invalid Response Set and Malingering in the Field of Psychological Injury and Law I: Basics2025
- Complications in Neuropsychological Assessment2025
- An overview of malingering and deception in neuropsychiatric casesBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2023
- Review of Statistical and Methodological Issues in the Forensic Prediction of Malingering from Validity Tests: Part I: Statistical IssuesNeuropsychology Review, 2023
- Review of Statistical and Methodological Issues in the Forensic Prediction of Malingering from Validity Tests: Part II—Methodological IssuesNeuropsychology Review, 2023
- Quo Vadis Forensic Neuropsychological Malingering Determinations? Reply to Drs. Bush, Faust, and JewsburyNeuropsychology Review, 2023
- From “below chance” to “a single error is one too many”: Evaluating various thresholds for invalid performance on two forced choice recognition testsBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2023
- Unifying Causality and Psychology2016
- The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5): Development and Initial Psychometric EvaluationJournal of Traumatic Stress, 2015
- Malingering, Feigning, and Response Bias in Psychiatric/ Psychological Injury2014