Optimizing Seeding Ratio for Semi-Leafless and Leafed Pea Mixture with Precise UAV Quantification of Crop Lodging
Open Access
Abstract
The field pea has both semi-leafless (SL) and leafed (L) types. Mixing these two types together might improve yield by optimizing pea solar radiation interception, reducing lodging, and decreasing disease. However, an optimum mixing ratio has not yet been established, since previous studies mixed two leaf types from two separate varieties. This study used four near-isogenic pairs of pea genotypes differing only in leaf type to determine the optimal mixing ratio for yield and agronomic traits. Two leaf types were mixed at seeding in five mixing ratios: 0:100, 50:50, 67:33, 83:17, and 100:0 SL/L. With precise UAV quantification of canopy height (r2 = 0.88, RMSE = 2.6 cm), the results showed that a ratio of over 67% semi-leafless pea had a 10% greater lodging resistance when compared to the leafed monoculture. For mycosphaerella blight and Uromyce viciae-fabae rust diseases, the 83:17 mixture decreased disease severity by 4% when compared with the leafed monoculture. Regression analysis of yield estimated that the 86:14 ratio provided an 11% increase to the leafed monoculture, but there was no increase compared with the semi-leafless monoculture. Mixing the two types in a high semi-leafless ratio can reduce leafed lodging and prevent yield loss but does not increase the overall yield over the semi-leafless monoculture.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Saskatchewan (20160294)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of pea plant architecture on spatiotemporal epidemic development of ascochyta blight ( Mycosphaerella pinodes ) in the fieldPlant Pathology, 2009
- Comparison of Leafy and Semileafless Pea for Integrated Weed ManagementWeed Technology, 2008
- Lodging increases severity and impact of mycosphaerella blight on field peaCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 2006
- The relationships among lodging, stem anatomy, degree of lignification, and resistance to mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum)Canadian Journal of Botany, 2005
- Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) response to field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivar and seeding rateCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1996
- The field pea crop in S.W. Australia. II. Effects of contrasting morphology and environment on reproductive performanceAustralian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1994
- Lodging and Yield of Dry Peas (Pisum sativum L.) as Influenced by Various Mixing Ratios of a Conventional and a Semi‐Leafless CultivarJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 1994
- A key for stages of development of the pea (Pisum sativum)Annals of Applied Biology, 1987
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL, LEAFLESS AND SEMI-LEAFLESS PHENOTYPES OF PEAS: PHOTOSYNTHETIC CO2 FIXATION IN VITROCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1981
- Correcting for Heterogeneity of Covariance for Repeated Measures Designs of the Analysis of VarianceEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1970