External Stenting for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors:
- Giovanni Jr SolettiGSGiovanni Jr Soletti
- Arnaldo DimagliADArnaldo Dimagli
- Lamia HarikLHLamia Harik
- Gianmarco CancelliGCGianmarco Cancelli
- Roberto Perezgrovas-OlariaRPRoberto Perezgrovas-Olaria
- Talal AlzghariTATalal Alzghari
- Michele Dell’aquilaMDMichele Dell’aquila
- Jordan LeithJLJordan Leith
- Sabrina CastagniniSCSabrina Castagnini
- Christopher LauCLChristopher Lau
- Leonard N. GirardiLGLeonard N. Girardi
- Mario GaudinoMGMario Gaudino
Open Access
- 29 November 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (23) , 7395
Abstract
The external stenting of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been proven to reduce intimal hyperplasia (IH) in animal models, paving the way for human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be conducted. Herein, we performed a study-level meta-analysis to assess the impact of the Venous External SupporT (VEST) device, an external stent, on the outcomes of SVGs. A systematic search was conducted to identify all RCTs comparing VEST-stented to non-stented SVGs in patients undergoing CABG. The primary outcome was graft occlusion. The main secondary outcomes were repeat revascularization, SVG IH area, and intimal-medial thickness. Two RCTs totaling 407 patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 1.5 years, there was no difference in graft occlusion between groups (incidence rate ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–1.53). The rate of repeat revascularization was also similar (odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.27–1.64). The IH area (standardized mean difference (SMD): −0.45; 95% CI: −0.79 to −0.10) and intimal-medial thickness (SMD: −0.50; 95% CI: −0.90 to −0.10) were significantly reduced in the VEST group. Our findings show that significant reductions in the IH area and the intimal-medial thickness in VEST-stented SVGs do not currently translate into a lesser need for repeat revascularization or less graft occlusion events compared to non-stented SVGs at 1.5 years after CABG.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessmentsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2020
- RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2019
- Saphenous vein grafts in contemporary coronary artery bypass graft surgeryNature Reviews Cardiology, 2019
- Current role of saphenous vein graft in coronary artery bypass graftingIndian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018
- Long-term performance of an external stent for saphenous vein grafts: the VEST IV trialJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2018
- A prospective study of external stenting of saphenous vein grafts to the right coronary artery: the VEST II studyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2017
- A Randomized Trial of External Stenting for Saphenous Vein Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2015
- Expandable external support device to improve Saphenous Vein Graft Patency after CABGJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2013
- Efficacy and Safety of Edifoligide, an E2F Transcription Factor Decoy, for Prevention of Vein Graft Failure Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryJAMA, 2005
- Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 yearsJACC, 1996