Anterior and Posterior Corneal Elevation After Orthokeratology and Standard and Customized LASIK Surgery
Authors:
- António QueirósAntónio Queirós
- César Villa-CollarCVCésar Villa-Collar
- Ángel Ramón M.D. GutiérrezÁGÁngel Ramón M.D. Gutiérrez
- Jorge JorgeJJJorge Jorge
- Maria Sameiro Dra. Ribeiro-QueirósMRMaria Sameiro Dra. Ribeiro-Queirós
- Sofia Claudia O.D. Peixoto-De-MatosSPSofia Claudia O.D. Peixoto-De-Matos
- José Manuel F.I.A.C.L.E. González-MéijomeJGJosé Manuel F.I.A.C.L.E. González-Méijome
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 37 (6) , 354-358
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the changes in the elevation topography of the front and back corneal surfaces after three different refractive treatments for correcting myopia with standard and custom laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and orthokeratology using corneal refractive therapy. Methods: We evaluated 20 eyes undergoing orthokeratology for correction of myopia spherical equivalent (mean±SD=−3.41±0.76 D), 18 eyes undergoing custom LASIK surgery (mean±SD=−4.14±0.89 D), and 23 eyes undergoing standard LASIK (mean±SD=−3.61±0.67 D). The values of front and back corneal surfaces were derived by using Pentacam (Oculus, Inc. GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) before and at least 3 months after each treatment, in the center of the cornea and 4 points to each side of the horizontal meridian at intervals of 1 mm. Results: Corneal elevation data before treatment were not statistically different between patients in either group (P>0.070, for back and front elevation). After treatment, both surgical procedures significantly increased the positive value of the front elevation beyond an area of 6 mm. The opposite trend was found within the central 5 mm of the cornea, presenting a statistically significant decrease in elevation (PP0.285). Conclusions: Differences in front corneal elevation changes between LASIK and orthokeratology reveal a much different mechanism for producing corneal power subtraction. The back corneal surface does not suffer significant changes after surgical and nonsurgical treatments for the correction of myopia.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Posterior Corneal Elevation After LASIK with Three Flap Techniques as Measured by PentacamJournal of Refractive Surgery, 2011
- Local Steepening in Peripheral Corneal Curvature After Corneal Refractive Therapy and LASIKOptometry and Vision Science, 2010
- Minor Influence of Myopic Laser In Situ Keratomileusis on the Posterior Corneal SurfaceInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2009
- The relationship between the treatment zone diameter and visual, optical and subjective performance in Corneal Refractive Therapy™ lens wearers 1Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2007
- Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topographyCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2007
- Nomogram, Corneal Topography, and Final Prescription Relations for Corneal Refractive TherapyOptometry and Vision Science, 2007
- Biomechanics and wound healing in the corneaExperimental Eye Research, 2006
- Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Overnight Orthokeratology Lens Wear Can Inhibit the Central Stromal Edema ResponseInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2005
- Evaluation of apparent ectasia of the posterior surface of the cornea after keratorefractive surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005