Patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and hyper-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characteristics and long-term evolution
Open Access
- 22 January 2009
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in EP Europace
- Vol. 11 (3) , 350-355
Abstract
In some patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM), left bundle branch block (LBBB), and severe cardiac failure, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reverse almost completely left ventricular (LV) function. These patients thus eligible to be qualified ‘hyper-responders’ are exclusively recruited in patients with NIDCM. Evaluate proportion of ‘hyper-responders’ among patients with NIDCM and try to determine their profile before implantation of CRT. Consecutive patients with DCM [LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 60 mm], sinus rhythm, LBBB, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV implanted with a CRT were prospectively followed. Patients were considered ‘hyper-responders’ if they fulfilled after a minimum period of 6 months the following criteria: functional recovery (NYHA class I or II) and LVEF ≥50%. Among the 51 NIDCM patients, 11 (21.5%) were ‘hyper-responders’ following CRT (LVEF increased from 26 ± 9 to 59 ± 6%, P < 0.01). In the 40 (78.5%) remaining patients, there was no or minimal functional improvement and only a modest increase in LVEF from 21 ± 9 to 26 ± 12% ( P = 0.03). Comparison between ‘hyper-responders’ and remaining patients showed that baseline parameters of ‘hyper-responders’ were less severely deteriorated. In a significant subset of patients with CRT for NIDCM, a ‘complete’ functional recovery associated with normalization of LV function was observed. This observation suggests that LBBB could be the causative factor of DCM in this subgroup of patients. There was not a unique discriminating factor at baseline between ‘hyper-responders’ and remaining patients.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary failure of cardiac resynchronization therapy: what are the causes and is it worth considering a second attempt? A single-centre experienceEP Europace, 2008
- Correlation Between Doppler Derived dP/dt and Left Ventricular Asynchrony in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Combined Study Using Strain Rate Imaging and Conventional Doppler EchocardiographyEchocardiography, 2007
- Tissue Doppler velocity is superior to displacement and strain mapping in predicting left ventricular reverse remodelling response after cardiac resynchronisation therapyHeart, 2006
- Contemporary Definitions and Classification of the CardiomyopathiesCirculation, 2006
- Evidence of Structural Remodeling in the Dyssynchronous Failing HeartCirculation Research, 2006
- Evaluation of left bundle branch block as a reversible cause of non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy with severe heart failure. A new concept of left ventricular dyssynchrony-induced cardiomyopathyEP Europace, 2005
- P3228 Influence of body mass index and metabolic-inflammatory variables on prognosis of outpatients with chronic heart failure. Data from the Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure (IN-CHF Registry)European Heart Journal, 2003
- Results of atrioventricular synchronous pacing with optimized delay in patients with severe congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Reversibility of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy after cure of incessant supraventricular tachycardiaJACC, 1990
- Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy: A reversible form of left ventricular dysfunctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986