Hybrid coronary revascularization: position paper of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery and European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions
Authors:
- Matthias ThielmannMatthias Thielmann
- Nikolaos BonarosNikolaos Bonaros
- Emanuele BarbatoEBEmanuele Barbato
- Fabio BariliFBFabio Barili
- Thierry FolliguetTFThierry Folliguet
- Guy FriedrichGFGuy Friedrich
- Roman GottardiRGRoman Gottardi
- Jacek LegutkoJLJacek Legutko
- Alessandro ParolariAPAlessandro Parolari
- Prakash PunjabiPPPrakash Punjabi
- Sigrid SandnerSSSigrid Sandner
- Piotr SuwalskiPSPiotr Suwalski
- 2 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 66 (2)
Abstract
Myocardial revascularization in coronary artery disease via percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery effectively relieves symptoms, significantly improves prognosis and quality of life when combined with guideline-directed medical therapy. Hybrid coronary revascularization is a promising alternative to percutaneous coronary intervention or CABG in selected patients and is defined as a planned and/or intended combination of consecutive CABG surgery using at least 1 internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending (LAD), and catheter-based coronary intervention to the non-LAD vessels for the treatment of multivessel disease. The main indications for hybrid coronary revascularization are (i) to achieve complete revascularization in patients who cannot undergo conventional CABG, (ii) to treat patients with acute coronary syndromes and multivessel disease with a non-LAD vessel as the culprit lesion that needs revascularization and (iii) in highly select patients with multivessel disease with complex LAD lesions and simple percutaneous coronary intervention targets for all other vessels. Hybrid coronary revascularization patients receive a left internal mammary artery graft to the LAD artery through a minimal incision along with percutaneous coronary intervention to the remaining diseased coronary vessels using latest generation drug-eluting stents. A collaborative environment with a dedicated heart team is the optimal platform to perform such interventions, which aim to improve the quality and outcome of myocardial revascularization. This position paper analyses the rationale of hybrid coronary revascularization and the currently available evidence on the various techniques and delves into the sequence of the interventions and pharmacological management during and after the procedure.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Late clinical outcomes of myocardial hybrid revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for complex triple‐vessel disease: Long‐term follow‐up of the randomized MERGING clinical trialCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020
- Current landscape of hybrid revascularization: A report from the NCDR CathPCI RegistryAmerican Heart Journal, 2019
- Study Design of the Graft Patency After FFR-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided CABG Trial (GRAFFITI)Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 2018
- Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysisCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2017
- Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: A comparison of fractional flow reserve–guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 2015
- Clinical outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with diabetes mellitusAmerican Heart Journal, 2014
- Comparison of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients ≥65 Years With Multivessel Coronary Artery DiseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2014
- Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,190 patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 2014
- Myocardial perfusion imaging with a cadmium zinc telluride-based gamma camera versus invasive fractional flow reserveEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2013
- Simultaneous “hybrid” percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: Feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomesAmerican Heart Journal, 2008