Impact of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) aggregation on economic thresholds in soybean
Authors:
- Michael J. CowbroughMCMichael J. Cowbrough
- Ralph B. BrownRBRalph B. Brown
- François J. TardifFTFrançois J. Tardif
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 51 (6) , 947-954
Abstract
One approach to site-specific weed control is to map weeds within a field and then divide the field area into smaller grid units. The decision to apply a herbicide to individual grid units, or decision units, is made by using yield loss models to establish an economic threshold level. However, decision units often contain weed populations with aggregated distributions. Many yield loss models have not considered this because experiments dealing with weed–crop competition typically assume uniform weed distributions. Therefore, these models may overestimate yield losses. Field experiments conducted in 1999 and 2000 compared the effects of common ragweed having a uniform distribution vs. an aggregated distribution on soybean seed yield, moisture content, and dockage. Field experiment data were used to calculate and compare economic thresholds for both distributions. Economic thresholds that considered drying costs and dockage also were compared. There was no significant difference inIparameters (yield loss as density approaches zero) between the two ragweed distributions in either year. Seed moisture content and dockage increased with increasing common ragweed densities, but increases were not significant at the break-even yield loss level. Economic threshold values were similar for both distributions with differences between aggregated and uniform of 0.14 and 0.01 plants m−2in 1999 and 2000, respectively. The economic threshold values were reduced by 0.01 to 0.06 plants m−2when drying costs and dockage were considered.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of site-specific weed management using a direct-injection sprayerWeed Science, 2001
- Spatial arrangement, density, and competition between barnyardgrass and tomato: I. Crop growth and yieldWeed Science, 2001
- Measures that describe weed spatial patterns at different levels of resolution and their applications for patch spraying of weedsWeed Research, 1998
- Incorporating spatial pattern of harmful organisms into crop loss modelsCrop Protection, 1996
- Prescription Maps for Spatially Variable Herbicide Application in No-till CornTransactions of the ASAE, 1995
- Weed surveys in different tillage systems in southwestern Ontario field cropsCanadian Journal of Plant Science, 1992
- Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed controlCrop Protection, 1990
- The Effect of Weed Distribution on Predictions of Yield LossJournal of Applied Ecology, 1990
- A simple model relating yield loss to weed densityAnnals of Applied Biology, 1985
- Tables for An Approximate Test for Outliers in Linear ModelsTechnometrics, 1975