Examining How Explanations from Multiple AI Agents Affect User Trust After AI Refusal
Open Access
- 6 September 2026
- conference paper
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1-12
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24K00447)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJPF2201)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJAP2404)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sincerity or incompetence? The double-edged sword effect of sadness expression in chatbots service failureJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2025
- Understanding consumer reactions to chatbot service failures: Evidence from a Wizard-of-Oz experimentActa Psychologica, 2025
- When chatbots make errors: Cognitive and affective pathways to understanding forgiveness of chatbot errorsTelematics and Informatics, 2024
- Seeking empathy or suggesting a solution? Effects of chatbot messages on service failure recoveryElectronic Markets, 2023
- A natural apology is sincere: Understanding chatbots' performance in symbolic recoveryInternational Journal of Hospitality Management, 2022
- Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakesNature Human Behaviour, 2019
- The effects of marketer- and advocate-initiated online service recovery responses on silent bystandersJournal of Business Research, 2017
- The role of the third party in trust repair processJournal of Business Research, 2017
- Responses to refusals of requests: Face threat and persistence, persuasion and forgiving statementsCommunication Quarterly, 2004
- Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968