An evidential framework for evaluating anchor measures in meaningful change research

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:

• Estimating the minimal important change of single-item measures using the adjusted predictive modeling method or the longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis method
  Quality of Life Research, 2026
• The Argument-Based Approach to Validity Applied to Clinical Outcome Assessments: Some History and Notable Features
  Value in Health, 2025
• Estimating meaningful thresholds for multi-item questionnaires using item response theory
  Quality of Life Research, 2023
• How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold
  Quality of Life Research, 2022
• Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory
  Quality of Life Research, 2022
• Improved adjusted minimal important change took reliability of transition ratings into account
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2022
• A confirmatory factor analysis approach was found to accurately estimate the reliability of transition ratings
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2022
• Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures
  Quality of Life Research, 2021
• Unlike ROC analysis, a new IRT method identified clinical thresholds unbiased by disease prevalence
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
• Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008