Publishers’ Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility
Open Access
- 7 November 2019
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- Vol. 257, 319-348
Abstract
Scholarly publishers can help to increase data quality and reproducible research by promoting transparency and openness. Increasing transparency can be achieved by publishers in six key areas: (1) understanding researchers’ problems and motivations, by conducting and responding to the findings of surveys; (2) raising awareness of issues and encouraging behavioural and cultural change, by introducing consistent journal policies on sharing research data, code and materials; (3) improving the quality and objectivity of the peer-review process by implementing reporting guidelines and checklists and using technology to identify misconduct; (4) improving scholarly communication infrastructure with journals that publish all scientifically sound research, promoting study registration, partnering with data repositories and providing services that improve data sharing and data curation; (5) increasing incentives for practising open research with data journals and software journals and implementing data citation and badges for transparency; and (6) making research communication more open and accessible, with open-access publishing options, permitting text and data mining and sharing publisher data and metadata and through industry and community collaboration. This chapter describes practical approaches being taken by publishers, in these six areas, their progress and effectiveness and the implications for researchers publishing their work.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- Licensing the future: report on BioMed Central’s public consultation on open data in peer-reviewed journalsBMC Research Notes, 2013
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Open by default: a proposed copyright license and waiver agreement for open access research and data in peer-reviewed journalsBMC Research Notes, 2012
- Classical peer review: an empty gunBreast Cancer Research, 2010
- Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trialsBMJ, 2010
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkBMC Medicine, 2010
- Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative reviewTrials, 2010
- Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS JournalsPLOS ONE, 2009
- Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized TrialPLOS ONE, 2007
- Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation RatePLOS ONE, 2007