‘You don’t want a smart Alec’: selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertations
Author:
- Margaret KileyMKMargaret Kiley
- 23 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education
- Vol. 34 (8) , 889-903
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nature's guide for mentorsNature, 2007
- Predicting examiner recommendations on Ph.D. thesesInternational Journal of Educational Research, 2004
- Examining the examiners: How inexperienced examiners approach the assessment of research thesesInternational Journal of Educational Research, 2004
- The selection of external examiners for research degreesQuality Assurance in Education, 2003
- The trials of being a PhD external examinerQuality Assurance in Education, 2003
- Questions in doctoral vivas: views from the insideQuality Assurance in Education, 2003
- 'It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize': How experienced examiners assess research thesesStudies in Higher Education, 2002
- Factors Influencing Successful Submission of PhD ThesesStudies in Higher Education, 2000
- The 'Academic' Qualities of Practice: What are the criteria for a practice-based PhD?Studies in Higher Education, 2000