The trials of being a PhD external examiner
Author:
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Quality Assurance in Education
- Vol. 11 (2) , 128-133
Abstract
The external examiner is the backbone of the system for PhD awards in the UK. Yet, when external examining is discussed in the abstract, the examiner is often seen as a villain who victimizes poor, helpless students. The assumption frequently seems to be that if students complain about the examining process, their view is automatically justified against the examiner. This paper draws on extensive personal experience, both in chairing research examinations and in being an external PhD examiner, to present the other side of the coin: the perspective of the examiner. It concludes with seven recommendations to improve the present system of PhD examining.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- 'It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize': How experienced examiners assess research thesesStudies in Higher Education, 2002
- Research degree examining – common principles and divergent practicesQuality Assurance in Education, 2002
- In the dark? Preparing for the PhD vivaQuality Assurance in Education, 2002
- Back to Basics: A consideration of the purposes of the PhD vivaAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2001
- Examining the Doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in BritainStudies in Higher Education, 2000
- Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners' reports on doctoral thesesStudies in Higher Education, 1997