Development and implementation of an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory test results
Authors:
- Gian Cesare GuidiGGGian Cesare Guidi
- Giovanni PoliGPGiovanni Poli
- Antonella BassiABAntonella Bassi
- Luca GiobelliLGLuca Giobelli
- Pier Paolo BenetolloPBPier Paolo Benetollo
- Giuseppe LippiGiuseppe Lippi
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Vol. 47 (11) , 1355-1360
Abstract
The verification/validation of laboratory test results is one of the most critical aspects of the total testing process, which may produce conflicts between competencies and duties at the point of professional crossroads. This process has centered for decades on the human component, with positive effects as well as potential adverse consequences (postanalytical errors). Manual validation of data is a time-consuming activity, is inherently subjective and arbitrary, and requires the constant presence of postgraduate physicians or biologists within the laboratory with adverse economical and organizational impacts. To overcome these inherent limitations, we have developed and implemented in our stat department an automatic system for verification, validation and delivery of laboratory results. The procedure is based on automatic validation of test results by an expert system, coupled with remote wireless connection, which allows the laboratory professional "on call" to access, visualize, analyze, validate and deliver alert values (suspect, erroneous or critical) using a small laptop. This system also provides five phases where preanalytical and analytical errors can be identified and handled. Six months following implementation of this innovative system, which can be customized to facilitate a wide variety of laboratory workflow models, the reporting efficiency of our stat laboratory has greatly improved, reducing manual data entry, and increasing the timeliness and utility of test results.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpretative reports and critical valuesClinica Chimica Acta, 2009
- Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicineClinica Chimica Acta, 2009
- Interpretative commenting: A tool for improving the laboratory–clinical interfaceClinica Chimica Acta, 2009
- Governance of preanalytical variability: Travelling the right path to the bright side of the moon?Clinica Chimica Acta, 2009
- Evaluation of Effectiveness of a Computerized Notification System for Reporting Critical ValuesAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- Will “personalized medicine” need personalized laboratory approach?Clinica Chimica Acta, 2009
- Undergraduate education in Laboratory MedicineClinica Chimica Acta, 2008
- Quality Improvement in Laboratory Medicine: Extra-Analytical IssuesClinics In Laboratory Medicine, 2008
- Managing transferability of laboratory dataClinica Chimica Acta, 2006
- The exciting story of cardiac biomarkers: From retrospective detection to gold diagnostic standard for acute myocardial infarction and moreClinica Chimica Acta, 2006