High-Sensitivity Troponin T, NT-proBNP, and Cognitive Outcomes in SPRINT
Authors:
- Yuan MaYMYuan Ma
- Djhenne DalmacyDDDjhenne Dalmacy
- Nicholas M. PajewskiNPNicholas M. Pajewski
- James A. de LemosJLJames A. de Lemos
- Elsayed Z. SolimanESElsayed Z. Soliman
- Christie M. BallantyneCBChristie M. Ballantyne
- Vijay NambiVNVijay Nambi
- Naveed SattarNSNaveed Sattar
- Anthony A. KilleenAKAnthony A. Killeen
- 1 September 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hypertension
- Vol. 81 (9) , 1956-1965
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hs-cTnT (cardiac troponin T measured with a highly sensitive assay) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) may identify adults with hypertension who derive greater cognitive benefits from lower systolic blood pressure targets. METHODS: In the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) MIND study, participants were categorized as having both hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP in the lower 2 tertiles (n=4226), one in the highest tertile (n=2379), and both in the highest tertile (n=1506). We assessed the effect of intensive versus standard treatment on the composite of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or probable dementia (PD) across biomarker categories. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, 830 of 8111 participants (10.2%) developed MCI or PD. Participants in the highest biomarker category were at higher risk of MCI or PD compared with those in the lowest category (hazard ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.00–1.56]). The effect of intensive treatment on reducing the risk of MCI or PD was greater among participants in the lowest biomarker category (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50–0.81]) than those in the intermediate (hazard ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.80–1.28]) or highest categories (hazard ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.72–1.13]; P interaction =0.02). The 5-year absolute risk differences in MCI or PD with intensive treatment were −2.9% (−4.4%, −1.3%), −0.2% (−3.0%, 2.6%), and −1.9% (−6.2%, 2.4%) in the lowest, intermediate, and highest biomarker categories, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In SPRINT, the relative effect of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering on preventing cognitive impairment appears to be stronger among participants with lower compared with higher cardiac biomarker levels, though the absolute risk reductions were similar.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identifying Patients for Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Based on Cognitive BenefitJAMA Network Open, 2023
- Longer-Term All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality With Intensive Blood Pressure ControlJAMA Cardiology, 2022
- Association of Systolic Blood Pressure With Dementia Risk and the Role of Age, U-Shaped Associations, and MortalityJAMA Internal Medicine, 2021
- Associations of High-Sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Levels With Outcomes After Intensive Blood Pressure LoweringJAMA Cardiology, 2021
- Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Incident Dementia or Cognitive ImpairmentJAMA, 2020
- Association of Midlife to Late-Life Blood Pressure Patterns With Incident DementiaJAMA, 2019
- Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable DementiaJAMA, 2019
- Association Between Midlife Vascular Risk Factors and Estimated Brain Amyloid DepositionJAMA, 2017
- Midlife Hypertension and 20-Year Cognitive ChangeJAMA Neurology, 2014
- Association of Serial Measures of Cardiac Troponin T Using a Sensitive Assay With Incident Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Mortality in Older AdultsJAMA, 2010