Association of participation in a supplemental nutrition program with stillbirth by race, ethnicity, and maternal characteristics
Authors:
- Meghan AngleyMAMeghan Angley
- Vanessa R. ThorstenVTVanessa R. Thorsten
- Carolyn Drews-BotschCDCarolyn Drews-Botsch
- Donald J. DudleyDDDonald J. Dudley
- Robert L. GoldenbergRGRobert L. Goldenberg
- Robert M. SilverRSRobert M. Silver
- Barbara J. StollBSBarbara J. Stoll
- Halit PinarHPHalit Pinar
- Carol J. R. HogueCHCarol J. R. Hogue
Open Access
- 24 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Vol. 18 (1) , 306
Abstract
Participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) has been associated with lower risk of stillbirth. We hypothesized that such an association would differ by race/ethnicity because of factors associated with WIC participation that confound the association. We conducted a secondary analysis of the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network’s population-based case-control study of stillbirths and live-born controls, enrolled at delivery between March 2006 and September 2008. Weighting accounted for study design and differential consent. Five nested models using multivariable logistic regression examined whether the WIC participation/stillbirth associations were attenuated after sequential adjustment for sociodemographic, health, healthcare, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors. Models also included an interaction term for race/ethnicity x WIC. In the final model, WIC participation was associated with lower adjusted odds (aOR) of stillbirth among non-Hispanic Black women (aOR: 0.34; 95% CI 0.16, 0.72) but not among non-Hispanic White (aOR: 1.69; 95% CI: 0.89, 3.20) or Hispanic women (aOR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.52, 1.52). Contrary to our hypotheses, control for potential confounding factors did not explain disparate findings by race/ethnicity. Rather, WIC may be most beneficial to women with the greatest risk factors for stillbirth. WIC-eligible, higher-risk women who do not participate may be missing the potential health associated benefits afforded by WIC.Keywords
Funding Information
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U10-HD045953 (Brown University), U10-HD045925 (Emory University), U10-HD045952 (University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston), U10-HD045955 (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio), UK10-HD045944 (University of Utah Health Sciences Center), U10-HD045954 (RTI International))
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The fetuses‐at‐risk approach: survival analysis from a fetal perspectiveActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2017
- Infant Mortality and Race in KansasJournal of Primary Care & Community Health, 2016
- Fetal and Perinatal Mortality: United States, 2013.2015
- WITHIN‐MOTHER ESTIMATES OF THE EFFECTS OF WIC ON BIRTH OUTCOMES IN NEW YORK CITYEconomic Inquiry, 2015
- Trends in Maternal Morbidity Before and During Pregnancy in CaliforniaAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2014
- Association Between Stillbirth and Risk Factors Known at Pregnancy ConfirmationJAMA, 2011
- Racial disparities in stillbirth risk across gestation in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2009
- Reassessing the WIC effect: Evidence from the Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance SystemJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2008
- The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York CityJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2005
- Evaluating WICEvaluation Review, 2000